Sir-BigBoyJames
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2009
- Messages
- 327
- Gender
- Male
- HSC
- 2006
please put forward these extreme cases that require the death penalty.Im against torture, but i do support the death penalty in absolutely extreme cases...
please put forward these extreme cases that require the death penalty.Im against torture, but i do support the death penalty in absolutely extreme cases...
I'd support your beheading tbh.Im against torture, but i do support the death penalty in absolutely extreme cases...
Sounds kinda kinky...Nah, but whether you take it sexually or not is really up to your own loins.
But yeah, I just want to skin you, roll you in salt and rub your stinging flesh against my teeth.
Nah, life of suffering makes so much more sense.Im against torture, but i do support the death penalty in absolutely extreme cases...
It's situations like this that are going to make me rich and famous when I invent and market a teleportation machine.Come to my house tonight.
'Nah, life of suffering makes so much more sense.
Give them a five-by-two cell with a toilet and no windows and watch them go insane.
There are quite a few, cbb really.please put forward these extreme cases that require the death penalty.
"All men must die. Not all men feel regret and suffer for their actions."There are quite a few, cbb really.
I think that torture is really useless. If a person did some thing extremely severe, and affected heaps of people in the process, then I reckon that they should and deserve to die. Torture in this case wont do any good though, its useless *shrugs*
It has the potential to traumatise and inhibit the capacity for rehabilitation, which should be the ultimate aim of the criminal processing system.Nobody has made any substantive argument against torture as a means of punishment.
Don't you live in Newcastle or some shit?I live in Sydney.
Nah, we're talking to replace capital puishment. So only for convicted serial killers who don't get parole. No harm in permenantly deforming them, both mentally and physically.It has the potential to traumatise and inhibit the capacity for rehabilitation, which should be the ultimate aim of the criminal processing system.
There's a high financial cost to society if the damage from torture eventually causes mental or physical disability and prohibits a prisoner from returning to work after release, making them dependent upon welfare.
I suspect it would be impossible for it to be used safely and consistently with any sort of restraint, over time it will escalate and lead to the worst.
It also substantially harms the torturer. It will inflict a lot of mental anguish upon innocent men.