• Congratulations to the Class of 2024 on your results!
    Let us know how you went here
    Got a question about your uni preferences? Ask us here

HSC 2013 MX2 Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Slightly offended that Fermat is worth more than Goldbach.
hahahahaha

===============

I will post a new question soon though, I just need to verify the result for myself.
 

GoldyOrNugget

Señor Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
583
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Here's a sexy beast of a geometry question, by yours truly.



 
Last edited:

GoldyOrNugget

Señor Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
583
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

I originally thought of using a^x > log_a x somehow but this came to me first.

Do you mind posting your method? I'm curious
It's a neat trick that I've seen crop up in a number of places, so it's definitely worth keeping in the back of your mind:



:)
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Here's a sexy beast of a geometry question, by yours truly.



Awesome question, loved it.

So first of all, we must define the rotating circle equation:



h, k are variable, they are variable with respect to the locus of the centre, and we are actually rotating the centre of the circle around the origin.

The parametric equation of the centre (considering the initial conditions)




So subbing this back in:



Expansion, then simplification, we also establish the fact that if the point exists inside the circle, then LHS < RHS

After simplification we get:



Using auxilliary angle rule, then more simplification we arrive at:



If we make inequality equality, then solve for t, we arrive at:





Testing points out:





Hope its right lol






It's a neat trick that I've seen crop up in a number of places, so it's definitely worth keeping in the back of your mind:



:)
oo, nice.
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

hey guys I made a new question:





Hahahaha.

Though really, if the mark allocations were to conform to the mark allocation of a HSC paper, each of those would be worth several thousand marks.
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Hahahaha.

Though really, if the mark allocations were to conform to the mark allocation of a HSC paper, each of those would be worth several thousand marks.
I would fancy most peoples chances of drawing several thousand 1 mark graphs over their chances of solving one of those three problems, and not by a small margin.
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Here's one that doesn't require much working out, but a bit of thinking to do.

Prove that an n-sided convex polygon can have its diagonals intersecting in AT MOST nC4 interior points.
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Here's one that doesn't require much working out, but a bit of thinking to do.

Prove that an n-sided convex polygon can have its diagonals intersecting in AT MOST nC4 interior points.
Ok, I decided to undergo a proof by induction:



If it is quadrilateral, it is obvious that there is only at most 1 point the diagonals can all intersect, and:



Hence it is true for n=4



We assume true that a k sided convex polygon can have at most diagonal intersections.

k sided polygon diagram



Ok, so we need to construct a k+1 sided polygon from the k sided polygon. We can do this by 'breaking one side into 2 pieces and joining it on' as shown:

k+1 sided polygon diagram

So we have done so as shown above. Now keep in mind that we already have kC4 intersections from before (I didn't show it).
So lets construct the k-2 number of diagonals from the new point we have constructed.



Ok, now notice the first red line I have constructed. Indeed there are: k-2 intersections from diagonals FROM THE OTHER POINTS
Look at the next red line, it is you could say 'defending' 2 points behind the second red line, there are (k-3) + (k-3) intersections from other points (k-3) for each point.
The pattern continues, the new intersections created by the new point is:



So lets evaluate this:



I can evaluate sum of squares through telescoping sum but I will skip this (or I could just rote the formula and put it down)



I plug in the formula, simplify and I end up with:



(srs)



And remember we already have intersections from before.
So NOW we have:

(by Pascal or otherwise)




=======

So satisfying to finally get the answer out of all that
 

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Ok, I decided to undergo a proof by induction:



If it is quadrilateral, it is obvious that there is only at most 1 point the diagonals can all intersect, and:



Hence it is true for n=4



We assume true that a k sided convex polygon can have at most diagonal intersections.

k sided polygon diagram



Ok, so we need to construct a k+1 sided polygon from the k sided polygon. We can do this by 'breaking one side into 2 pieces and joining it on' as shown:

k+1 sided polygon diagram

So we have done so as shown above. Now keep in mind that we already have kC4 intersections from before (I didn't show it).
So lets construct the k-2 number of diagonals from the new point we have constructed.



Ok, now notice the first red line I have constructed. Indeed there are: k-2 intersections from diagonals FROM THE OTHER POINTS
Look at the next red line, it is you could say 'defending' 2 points behind the second red line, there are (k-3) + (k-3) intersections from other points (k-3) for each point.
The pattern continues, the new intersections created by the new point is:



So lets evaluate this:



I can evaluate sum of squares through telescoping sum but I will skip this (or I could just rote the formula and put it down)



I plug in the formula, simplify and I end up with:



(srs)



And remember we already have intersections from before.
So NOW we have:

(by Pascal or otherwise)




=======

So satisfying to finally get the answer out of all that
Alternatively:

Each pair of intersecting diagonals gives rise to a convex quadrilateral with vertices among the vertices of your polygon P (the convex quadrilateral with these two diagonals).

Different pairs of intersecting diagonals give rise to different convex quadrilaterals through the above construction.

A convex quadrilateral is uniquely determined by its 4 vertices. (This statement is NOT true for non-convex quadrilaterals.)

So #{pts. of intersection} =< #{pairs of intersecting diagonals } =< #{of subsets of the vertices of P of size 4} = nC4.
 
Last edited:

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Alternatively:

Each pair of intersecting diagonals gives rise to a convex quadrilateral with vertices among the vertices of your polygon P (the convex quadrilateral with these two diagonals).

Different pairs of intersecting diagonals give rise to different convex quadrilaterals through the above construction.

A convex quadrilateral is uniquely determined by its 4 vertices. (This statement is NOT true for non-convex quadrilaterals.)

So #{pts. of intersection} =< #{pairs of intersecting diagonals } =< #{of subsets of the vertices of P of size 4} = nC4.
Yep, is the solution I had in mind, though very nice work Sy123 for managing to get that initially-messy solution to actually work out!
 

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

Alternatively:

Each pair of intersecting diagonals gives rise to a convex quadrilateral with vertices among the vertices of your polygon P (the convex quadrilateral with these two diagonals).

Different pairs of intersecting diagonals give rise to different convex quadrilaterals through the above construction.

A convex quadrilateral is uniquely determined by its 4 vertices. (This statement is NOT true for non-convex quadrilaterals.)

So #{pts. of intersection} =< #{pairs of intersecting diagonals } =< #{of subsets of the vertices of P of size 4} = nC4.
Yep, is the solution I had in mind, though very nice work Sy123 for managing to get that initially-messy solution to actually work out!

Ahaha, yeah my solution isn't as elegant as your one but I like it because it actually worked out.

=========================

A question that is a little easier to other people don't get scared off or anything:





(it isn't that long if you can create shortcuts for yourself.)
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon







 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

First define that 1+x > 0 therefore x > -1

Step 1:

n=1 -> 1+x = 1+x

Hence true for n=1

Step 2:

Assumption

Step 3:



From step 2:








==========================

My questions are still unanswered.
 

HeroicPandas

Heroic!
Joined
Mar 8, 2012
Messages
1,547
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

First define that 1+x > 0 therefore x > -1

Step 1:

n=1 -> 1+x = 1+x

Hence true for n=1

Step 2:

Assumption

Step 3:



From step 2:








==========================

My questions are still unanswered.
Nice. I'm trying to do ur insane questions lol
 

GoldyOrNugget

Señor Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
583
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

at work, so ill be answering these intermittently

i) use sin(2a) = 2sin(a)cos(a) repeatedly, expanding the sin each time.

ii) i don't get this question.
 
Last edited:

Sy123

This too shall pass
Joined
Nov 6, 2011
Messages
3,730
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
Re: HSC 2013 4U Marathon

at work, so ill be answering these intermittently



i) use sin(2a) = 2sin(a)cos(a) repeatedly, expanding the sin each time.

ii) i don't get this question.
Find the other expression for it using part i (just divide by theta then take n to infinity)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top