Recent content by crazybea

your right should have been "equality" mine was "right to freedom" - Slavery etc

heres rationale for just robbery Completing a crime is usually needed before you're charged and possibly convicted. Back out before finishing, and you can't be found guilty. However, did you know certain acts done in preparing for a crime can be crimes themselves? These are called inchoate...

no if dale robbed the bank THEN drove away he would be charged with both alex DID NOT rob the bank and hence would not be charged under property i did white collar (fuck me) but yeah its defo driving

also going by ur logic the charge comes before the committal proceeding so its either empanelment or charge

the trick here was the "criminal TRIAL process" the trial starts off with jury empanelment the committal proceeding initiates the trial process (but is not the first step WITHIN it) its ridiculous imo + regardless of ur reasoning, i pulled that from the textbook

also alex committed a DRIVING offence (not property) "If a motor vehicle is used to assist in the commission of an offence, the court sentencing the offender has the power to disqualify the person from holding or obtaining a driver's licence, either for a specified period or until further...

OMG LMAO the answer is actually jury empanelment fuck me "it is appropriate to consider jury selection as the first step in a criminal trial"

ill check my tbook

dale will only be charged with robbery alex would be charged with conspiracy pretty certain

whats the answer to the first step in the criminal trial process

education is not protected in the constitution clearly remember my teacher saying

some of urs are wrong

lol

Re: GetUp! demands apology for senator's Nazi youth slur Read more: http://www.smh.c well, look at u

nope