Well thats a bit blunt. They have to have legitimate reasoning because after all, we are the electors of his government. You'd like to think the system has reasoning behind something as historical as this.
Well look at itt this way. He has put forward a reform and as a result has been pushed out of his job. I believe this was because they are trying to address the interest of the public because obviously .. ( you would see on the advertisements on tv ) it is a big fat fail .
Oh haha well you know what I mean... but in the trials we are asked to use most recent "evidence" and.. this is pretty recent.. but what would you say this goes under... failure in the justice system in relation to law reforms? Unable to mirror human rights because he failed to concern the...
As far as the HSC is concerned, would you say this is some sort of failure in the justice system?
What was the solid reasons for him to be executed in parliament?
What were the reforms he mentioned?