me too!! I think maybe 75-80 raw? this year's paper seemed mediocre although it was v different to previous years and I'm certain that much of the cohort smashed it which means the cutoff can't be too low. so yea I think 75-80 raw, 80+ might be too high because the paper was kinda difficult
since you have a skills test coming up (100% skills as opposed to 20%skills + 80%content), I will give you tips on studying biology skills. before my skills test, my teacher told us that she would try her best to NOT include any content-based questions to ensure the exam is PURELY skills. this...
yes but phagocytes are also part of 3rd line (after antibodies immobilise the antigen, phagocytes come and destroy the pathogen right). there's no grey area with stomach acid, it can only be 1st line. it's the pH of stomach acid that's relevant to the immune response (also some antimicrobial...
sorry people don't stress, the q didn't say to give an example
I just thought if you're describing an adaptation it makes sense to state which plant corresponds with it but yea idk it depends on the criteria
you mean that plant adaptation one? sorry I don't remember much from the exam
I spoke about banksias (Australian example) and how they have woody fruits, so that when they fall naturally or during bushfires, a good deal of water isn't lost. obviously there's more to it than that
also I think...