Recent content by J-Smart

Homosexuality is a sympton.

The reason as to why I chose Phaedo is because these are students, if we go into some highly philosophical debate i'm sure they would not understand. By the way Phaedo is the implication of physicalism and dualism, and so is readily used by philosophers.

The existence of the soul read Phaedo. The beginning of the universe - if the beginning of the universe in the case of scientists who argue it had an exact time in which it began - can they explain how it originated. If they implement matter, it would then make matter eternal.

Te spiritual relam of existence embodies within a human being free will and as evident in human being an intellectual ability. This is just as important and as real as the preposition about th naturalistic thought. Furthermore, the naturalistic solution you are proposing is not even taking into...

Well then can you propose how the 'general causality' argument for the existence of God is incorrect? And further, I can only see rebuttal that is implementing a deductive line of thought. Can you provide an inductive reason, refuting the 'general causality' argument.

All that a philosopher has to state, is the general causality argument, which has been irrefutable.

The 'problem' of proving the existence of God, in the case of the divinity of Christ can actually be explored. From a purely philosophical notion of thought, the existence of Jesus himself reflects on the "economic" formulation of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity, as God has chosen to...

I would of had thought - this argument may have been a whole heap more interesting. It is only after reading the last couple of pages I found it has come down to :argue: with no real substance.