I thoug crime was shit! I can't even remeber my text book saying that much on international law that you could be expected to write a freaken 8 mark amswer! Shit!!!!!!!!!! And seriously, what the hell was with that senario? Talk about ambiguous... didn't have hardly any acts, and what the hell...
I did victims rights, specifically the rights of sexual assault victims. If anyone has the Excel book, there are examples of criminal justice issues in there, eg mandatory sentencing, prisoners rights etc.
There is a section in the syllabus that describes the "legal issues faced by consumers". Check it out.
In my essay i talk about things such as power imbalance between consumer and manufacturers, harsh contracts, alternative dispute resolution, credit and the problems involved with e-commerce.
Rule of Law- basically two concepts 1-the law must be known and 2- the law must be applied equally to everyone.
Doctrine of justice- two main concepts 1- defendent has the right to be heard and 2- judge must be impartial and fair
Natural justcie- see doctrine of justice (same thing)...
I am doing Brookes production and am focusing on act 1 scene 1 and act 5 scene 3. You could talk about the fact that the staging is bare, the setting, the way the lines are spoken by the charcters, the use of alternatifve angles, the fact the film is in black and white, the opening panning shot...
The book was called representations of change and isn't therefore valid that in the book there could be a discussion on a film? The BOS tells us that a film is a valid text, so surely they wouldn't design a question to exclude people from talking about films?