Search results

It depends. If the female was recruited under government policies of Affirmitive Action, then no, it does not infringe upon ANY sort of legislation. EEO policies are only in place so that ALL candidates are acknowledged and have had their fair share of interviewing/analysing. I don't believe...

ahahaha...that's funni however u interpret it...:p the little mermaid...she makes me all hot and sweaty.

I agree with Argonaut to an extent. Fair enough, the guy may LOVE you to bits, but at the end of the day, he's still in it for some sexy time. The sensitive ones just use a bit more time and effort in order to get the same result.

I do understand that. I was poitning out that I could not go on to actually DEFEND anything (as u put) if you did not actually ATTACK me or anything I hold of importance. (whether it be UoW, it's law school or the people who study there). It didn't prove anything of that nature at all. My...

u arent expecting him to say..."im trying to get ur attention in this fashion...are u intrested yet?" :p asking him whats wrong is truely a symptom of ur increasing interest towards him. omg malazn pleasure has all da forumulaaaaes...!

1) I was not defending anything because you were not attacking me. Or were you? 2) If you attacking me then that says a lot about your character and wit. Since you're attacking me and not the issue at hand. 3) I was talking about UoW in general. I do not see "LLB" or "Law" in the referred...

I reckon... there are so many ways to get out of jury duty. which should not be examined and discussed any further since jury duty is a right and responsibility of every voting citizen in australia.....:p

I don't think it changes what the person is trying to convey. It may true. All UoW'ers YOU know may be dumb in the head. It still doesn't change the fact that this observation is relevant to only the people YOU know. It is true though, that this may be used as a bad argument in support or...

yeah..but bi's do not know what fidelity because one part of them will never be satisfied. my opinion. :p

I'd take it as a No until they DO get back to me.

lol listen to malazn pleasure. :p

In most universities, you are only allowed to do drop the Law component of your degree. The only universities (that I know of) which allow you to do a straight undergraduate LLB are UTS and UoW (starting 2006).

Meh. :p With all due respect: Funny attempt at backing up what you said previously. It would be interesting to see how you interpret your various law readings.

Which Ms 12 is planning on doing. :uhhuh: Or else you can go to UTS and do the straight LLB.

He should be asking the university for the appropriate disability service. During my first Marketing subject, someine was hired to be a notetaker by the university because some doode/ette couldn't access the lecture properly or something. You can PAID to be a notetaker!!!! OMg!!!

My Legal Studies acted stupid pre-court time and he was asked to leave straight away. :p

I'm not trying to ruin your plans at all, but if you fall apart, boo......gimmie a call.

But Arts (psych) isn't the same as a pure psych/law degree is it?

Honkies actually MAY use English in the Honkie courtrooms. A LOT of judges ONLY use English in HK because a lot of them are Englishmen. :) I'm not sure about most asians but the sentiment I get in Australia is that if you can make the same amount of money on court or off, then why not do...

I'm happy just to work with/for the law at any level. As long as I'm financially well off, I don't give a shit. That's one sexy career history by lawrence ma: Career history Yeo Seng Lam Public Accountant (Singapore) - Tax accountant [January - March 1995] KPMG Peat Marwick...