Search results

i didnt think the exam was that bad. the listening was okay but the second comprehension was hard, i thought. and the writing subjects were very specific and you couldn't really expand much with them. wasn't expecting an email either! my friend and i got interviewed for the newcastle herald too...

i spoke about two poems and linked the different aspects and techniques in them to my two related pieces. i think i ended up writing about 5-6 pages. does anyone else agree that this question was favoured to consumerism?

i think paper two was very good, especially question one, as it was VERY general, and we could write about ANYTHING! My "witness" one annoyed me a bit, because I had prepared everything for Book and Rachel, not Book and Samuel. But, oh well. Dawe was probably my worst as well, but I think that...

my teacher lent me a novel called "Plain Truth", about an amish girl allegedly having a baby- then killing it. it spoke about amish being excommunicated from their church. so, i wrote about how my character chose love in the western world over her church and family, and was excommunicated from...

I think that the test was actually quite hard. Even the mulitple choice questions were hard, I thought. And just because you finished first and used big words does not mean that you did very well. I hope you get your results back and are very disappointed, just because you were cocky about it.