Search results

i dont feel like arguing about this with you? You dont actually know me, my performance in that subject OR what happened to me during my exam. Youre also pointing out the obvious, nothing in life is guaranteed, you can walk outside and get hit by a bus or something. and i am aware of extra...

sure you can say that, but I disagree for my personal situation. Im likely to get a mid 90 in that subject externally and wouldve done so in the trial if i didnt have the misadventure - which only impacted 1 section of the exam. Regardless, youre still allowed to be a bit upset with yourself and...

lol james ruse papers r def harder - ive done the english ones and they short answer text selections def make you THINK more - they also expect you to write A LOT, way harder than other schools papers

i actually get what you mean because you feel like your rank isnt proportional to your ability. the same thing happened to me, i messed up my trial and lost 1st because i was sick. while the marks and ranks were much closer together in my situation its disheartening to know that your true...

ik i said i was ignoring mr.ai but its just so disingenuous to give out mental health advice from a fricken robot 💀 AGAIN like you sound soooo robotic maybe speak as yourself if u wanna give out actual constructive, meaningful and helpful advice

yeah thats basically it

its in the search bar above the list

a school near me isnt even on the list... like what. and ik that would be an extremely low ranking school, pretty much 0 band 6s

to finish paper 2 in time you will really wanna aim to do it in 40 unless you can make up time in mod c or something

youll wanna get a bit faster - youre only meant to take 45 and you should account for time to plan - but its not bad id say? EDIT: 40 minutes oops

LOVE atwood too, I use one of her short stories as my supplementary for ext 😍

very likely better than looking for richard

MACRO 😍 and yes i agree - the markers can see your simile (well actually they cant bc its marked seperate anyway) but they dont need u to point it out you know.. macro techniques r the way to go for the justification, ESPECIALLY bc youre giving that marker a well rounded and cohesive analysis...

the most boring mod a text and the idiot who made it

the whole thing is weird bc i dont think he ever actually put out the film? all he did was release the docudrama which is a weird hybrid of a doc with random actual filmed scenes throughout. he cast winona ryder and she was literally in it for 2 minutes max

def not - he cuts out all the women scenes from lfr, reduces them to impotent characters there to serve his own ambition and plot. he deliberately casts a young, naive actress AND THEN CUTS ALLLL HER SCENES way to go

literally never again... never ever... yay...

i had to watch it a second time before it made sense. I ABSOLUTELY HATED IT when we watched it in class, i didnt pay any attention- the usual line of argument people make is that hes trying to bring shakespeare to a modern american audience, removing the religion so it fits an ambitious and...

also on the atars - i think regardless of where you look people will be sharing them, especially if theyre excited or happy about their result. If you care about them for more than, what, a week? get a lifee pls! they become so obsolete so i think we all need to keep that in mind regardless of...

for the most part they are negative. i can appreciate him as an actor and appreciate lfr in some aspects but i think ultimately hes a prick trying to affirm his own status as an actor/director. I hate his treatment and dismissal of women in lfr A LOT