Search results

we might be cooked for pdhpe but at least young thug free fr

U got this lil bro

ain't no way weiland doing the hsc rn

Anyone else still have pdh on tuesday but feel like they've already finished? 💀

Yeah i’d say probably, but marking will be harsher, so a response for a 5 marker which may have gotten you full marks last year will only get you 4/5 if that makes sense. Our short answer questions were a lot easier.

This pretty much can’t happen, they will just continue to revise their marking criteria until they get around a median they like. The break-even will still be like 75

nah bro, i’m sure it’s explained in those videos which were posted, but it’s definitely C because of how sex-linked traits work. for the 4th pedigree, neither parent is showing the trait but it is passed down to 3/4 sons and no daughters. This means it is sex-linked recessive, as the daughters...

86-> 90 last year. This exam was objectively a lot easier except our mcq were harder, look at some of their short answer. I would say it might be 88 which scales to a band 6

it kinda helps if you think about the relationship between the cases. In infectious diseases, an increased amount of cases will result in an even more increased amount of cases, so it’s an exponential relationship. But since this was for a non infectious disease, that relationship wouldn’t make...

depends what you wanna get, it might be close to the cutoff for band 6 tho

Yeah, I think that this is why D is incorrect. Even though genetic drift can result in natural selection, the question says ‘introduction of more b alleles’. Idk if this implies they are introduced from new individuals (which would be gene flow) or if they’re just using that word to talk about...

how did everybody go in multiple choice? Using these solutions i got 19/20, I thought question 18 was D.

Not sure how it would work if you didn’t actually name a disease, because then what you are saying could just be generic info about any disease. Should hopefully still get 3 marks though, marking for 5 markers similar in 2023 would’ve gotten you 3 marks i’d say

Probably would have been better off just saying sugarcane disease, you’re not actually talking about a disease when you talk about ‘dieback’

I also think the biggest thing to consider when designing the program is just the transition from a focus on overall health to sport specific skills when changing from the off season -> preseason -> in-season

Most I could see is a multiple choice question asking you to identify the most effective training rogram

make sure to remember every single useless dot point and you’ll be fine

I’d say that this paper definitely makes sense with the idea that the exam contractors are hired to write two papers, and then it changes after two years, considering the difficulty of 2023 and 2024 compared to 2021 and 2022. This means that 2025 is likely to be a lot more difficult as the...

I think because we were told to use the line of best fit to predict a future population it would make more sense for it to be linear. That question didn’t require you to assume a future value, and the points were much more spaced apart due to it being an exponential relationship

if you managed to descriptively outline the entirety of the innate and adaptive immune response in the amount of lines we were given for that question that is lowkey hella impressive