Search results

Yeah, and you're not missing much. Not much to see in Sydney, and it's cold and miserable.

Dad and I started learning together as a "father/daughter" thing.

kwayera.deviantart.com :)

Nah, started diving when I was 13; got my MSD when I was.. I dunno, 16? Can't be stuffed to get the card and check.

PADI. OW AOW Rescue Diver + Medic First Aid Master Scuba Diver Specialties: Shark Diver Deep Diver Drift Diver Boat Diver Night Diver Underwater Photographer Diver Propulsion Vehicle Diver Enriched Air Diver Multilevel Diver Peak Performance Buoyancy Project AWARE: Fish ID Search and Recovery...

Yes, they underestimated it. Pissed me off because I had to change all my figures and calculations in an assignment. Besides, even if it was only 54cm, do you know how significant that is? False. False. I don't listen to Al Gore, so kindly stop bringing him up. You're embarrassing...

Anywhere from now to 500 years. Climate is seriously hard to predict, which is why most of our estimates have turned out to be underestimates so far. Significant effects, however, will be seen in the next 100 years.

None of the people in these threads that deny AGW/ACC have any knowledge of any of the science or scientific principles. They categorically do not understand, and nor do they wish to. Typical of conspiracy theorists.

There are cycles of climate change. Cyclical events are, however, generally very gradual or, if they have a short temporal scale, they're not very extensive. This is fast and very extensive; this is not a part of the normal cyclical climate patterns.

Who says any of us listen to Al Gore?

Yes, because you with no scientific training and/or knowledge are entirely qualified to say that.

Well it doesn't really need to be answered. A large percentage of the world's population lives on or near the coast, in Bangladesh and on pretty much every other continent.

Yeah, levels will rise up to an average metre or so (possibly more), which doesn't sound like a lot but is actually pretty epic.

Kills ozone which essentially IS a greenhouse gas, but one which absorbs between 93-99% of the ultra high frequency ultraviolet light from the sun (the bad stuff).

Too thick. I wouldn't diffuse into the ice quick enough to prevent the surface from melting. Also, CFCs, if it got into the atmosphere, would kind of compound the problem don't you think?

Wow, I wouldn't like to be those poor doctors. I saw an obese baby the other day. It was disgusting; I wanted to lay into the mother, but how do you do that?

Well, it's not the SEA ice that's the main problem - it's ice on land (i.e. Greenland and the majority of Antarctica).

I wonder how warm your mitochondria would keep you on the moon :p

Um. Dude. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_effect vs "Enhanced" Greenhouse effect (i.e. anthropogenic global warming/climate change). Without the greenhouse effect, we'd all be frozen popcisles.

Rephrase, or the denier will think that there is no such thing as the greenhouse effect keeping us alive. :p