Search results

In response to your question, i had 5 pages of notes for each topic and managed a 92 in my trials. Business studies= common sense imo.

Dude, chill out. I'm sure no one here had the intention of making fun of you. Unfortunately, a 75 in your case is a far cry, but that shouldn't stop you from studying hard and aiming for the highest mark in your upcoming exams. At the moment id say your looking at around mid to low 60's, given...

Its Consumer Law, but what you're saying is right. And also the question was 'Objectives of consumer law' which pretty much covers contemporary issues aswell

From the top of my head, For the foods question, i chose carbonization (which is correct, confirmed) For the Tomb question, i picked outside Herculaneum gate. (Also correct) For the 'whats in Pompeii but not in Herculaneum', i chose the one with forum (correct aswell) The rest (i can't remember)...

Hatshepsut (a) was tricky since you had to talk about her background before she became pharaoh (regency, queen consort etc..). It was easy though bahah. inb4 97/100 lost 3 marks in Mycenae cos leisure activities ar3 c00l.

The question specifically asked for the sentencing and punishment process. If you didnt mention the core stuff like statutory+judicial guidelines, agg+mitigating factors etc etc then you probably won't end up in the top band. I based my argument around the impact discretion(during sentencing and...

Curious, why A for 17?. I think its C. The question states defendant so its a criminal offence. Criminal offences can be summary. The case of DietrichvQueen already shows us that there is no guarenteed right to a lawyer, so thats obviously gone. A hearing is still heard in summary offences, even...

inb4 crime question fucks everyone over

Are you being serious? Theres no way they would allow that.