Search results

It's so much lower than everyone elses, but I don't mind cos I will most likely get into my first preference. (Pharm at UNE) 84.5, matrix predicted 85

I've had a hundred people tell me not to get weaves and yes, they aren't too good for your hair. BUT what I do is just get them for special occasions and then take them out straight away and then keep the hair so it stays in tact, then pay the hairdressers just to put them back in. Bankstown...

Yeah I did that but I didn't know what anode to use.. what did you use?

I realise that the solubility of gases increases with ocean depth due to increased pressure and decreased temperature, but what about at the light zone and in between?

Oh yeah I didn't think of that.. that would be easy too!

I hope the extended response will be on Galvani, Volta etc that'll be easy as! I'll die if they put something bout water quality or anything from acidic environment lol If they did put anything from the acids module as an extended response what do you reckon it would be?

On that note, do you think that if we get a state wrong in an equation we wouldn't get the mark?

Oh right right I getcha. Thanks =)

Thanks heaps for the quick reply! =) That's what I thought, but I just read over a prac (the first one on shipwrecks) and it said that the steel corroded more than the iron. If iron contains more carbon than steel, why did the steel corrode quicker? It was in the Success One book.

Yeah man heaps especially more towards Casula and Glenfield

Can someone quickly tell me the connection between the amount of carbon in a steel and the rate at which it corrodes.. I'm guessing it's more carbon -> more cathodic sites -> corrodes quicker Is that right??

Re: Is itr eally neccesary to memorise the precipitation reactions and the processes I know all the precipitation tests but are there any equations I need to memorise?

hahahahaha soo funny yet so true

Thanks heaps!!

This thread is hilarious lol I literally laughed out loud when someone said something about the bogans congregating.. like they were some kind of organisation ahahahaha but yeah I agree with what most people are saying.. Liverpool has some shockers too lol

Thanks guys, that helps a lot!! :)

Ok wait I do get what you're saying.. so it's sorta assumed that all of the CO2 released during fermentation and combustion of ethanol is going to be absorbed during photosynthesis

Yeah theoretically it's right but it actually doesn't take into account the carbon dioxide that is used in photosynthesis to produce the glucose 6CO2 + 6H2O -> C6H12O6 + 6O2 so there is actually more carbon dioxide used than is produced

I was just wondering, other than that it is renewable and undergoes complete combustion, what is another advantage of using ethanol as a fuel? I was going to use 'carbon neutral' but I've just been told that it's incorrect. Any help would be much appreciated =) Thanks

Can someone please explain these terms to me, and the measures to take to improve on these things? Thanks =)