Search results

Yeah, great section. All the questions were straightforward.

As I cut a lot of corners while studying, I'm just hoping I revised the right content. If I did, I'd be golden, if not..well , I'm just hoping for the best.

How did you structure the leadership struggle one? I know the events and reasons stalin won the struggle but is it structure by reasons or stages of events?

If It was in relation to totalitarianism, would it be irrelevant to mention other contributions to Stalin's totalitarian regime, such as cult of personality etc , if the question focuses on the terror aspect alone?

I'm like you and a slow writer, so I just focus on the main points most relating to the question and elaborate on those. This hasn't stopped me from getting good marks at any time, so If you cant include everything , I'm sure you can still get high marks.

If an essay question were to come up in the exam about this topic dot-point , would It be more focused on terror in Stalin's leadership period alone , or terror in the communist party covering Lenin's leadership of the Bolsheviks as well?

Is there a chance Trotsky's life in exile be asked? For part A or B ?

surfing eBay

Do we need to know the actual terms of the treaty of versailles? Is there any chance of a 10 markers question around this ?

No problem. Heres a comprehensive table of all the changes in foreign policy. http://www.boredofstudies.org/download.php?id=9122

Since I haven't 100% covered foreign policy and don't want to mislead you, I found this. Sorry I couldn't help you more

Well, I haven't exactly studies foreign policy but I have studied the rest of Russia and I'm pretty sure that Collectivisation and industrialisation are stalin's economic policies and War communism and NEP are the Bolsheviks economic policies.

Hatshepsut. Wbu?

Yeah thats the one

Yeah, I have a feeling they'll be sadistic and repeat..something.. I'm really hoping for role of queens, so straight forward. What do you think of skipping the external section of NKE and focusing on the earlier section? Stupid idea? Because there will be a question for both sections, and well...

Empire has come up for the last 2 years though, will they really ask that again?

I was in the same boat as you. History is also my best subject and I consistently came 2nd, and always by a few marks only. Oh , the frustration! Anyways, my point is, for my overall internal rank, thanks to my collective assignments/trials and the 1st ranked person screwing up the trial exam...

Anybody have any guesses on what the question might be? Do you think the importance of building programs / religious policy in the NKP will come up?

Finish next monday. Can't wait!

Re: Honestly, anyone else found the financial ratios questions hard? :\ It was easy, the first thing I did in the exam.