Search results

I think the thing that makes an extension history paper impossible to predict is that the extracts are quite important and there is really no way to tell what they will be. Apart from that there are a limited number of questions they can ask because the syllabus is quite small.

I think most people like their personality; there is one constant around which you can construct your understanding. I find my personality - Tib. Sempronius Gracchus Tr. pl. 133BC - easier than my other topics too. Hopefully they don't give really nasty questions for the time period, because I...

I think that it entirely depended on your own experiences of nature. My paragraph on the photograph was longer than my article on the non-fiction because I live out west and am more familiar with the experience of dust storms than I am with going to the Sydney Uni Quadrangle.

Isn't that the entirety of the question though? My thoughts on the essay was that the trap was going down a rabbit hole of trying to sound like you had revolutionary new analysis and then not answering the question. Anyways, it is all over now and we can't do anything about it.