Search results

oops, sorry, i dont find that to be "sarcastic" at all... q2 is c!!!!

shut up you fag, u are the dumbest person in the entire universe and have no idea of what economics is. u are the one who is gonna receive the "mystery mark" UAI of 30!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED!!! FINISHED!!FINISHED...

exactly!! c is the rite answerrrrrrrrrrrrr, yay!! 20/20 for me...

i got the same!!! and ive checked with my eco teacher, she believed that these are the best answers!! [edit] i still dont think a is the rite answer for q2, structural change is only the cause of eco growth and development, it is not an effect and therefore it cant be an indicator of eco...

i guess you will just have to face the reality sometimes

yes,you can. expense ratio = total expense/ total sales = (gross profit - net profit ) / total sales=gross profit/total sales - net profit/total sales= gp ratio-np ratio

q1 is definitely b, i asked my business teacher who is a hsc head marker, and he agreed with me.

two efficiency indicators are expense ratio and a/c r turnover ratio. expense ratio= gross profit ratio- net profit ratio. the expense ratio has increased from 2004 to 2005, that means the business is becoming less efficient, the increase in expense means an increase in current liability, this...

WOOHOOOOO!!Jay Chow's brand new album "November's Chopin" just hits the shelve this morning!! just wondering if anyone has listened to the songs yet, i have!! they are mad, youve gotta listen to them. i think its heaps better than the previous album "common orange jasmine", Jay is just...

we had lawn mowing thing going on during 4u maths exam, and it went on for like 1 hr non-stop, i lost my concentration completely, that was so irritating....argh.....

after going through the solution for a number of times, i think my raw mark will be around 73-77, im quite satisfied actually :rolleyes: since i did not make too many silly mistakes like i did in trial. hope i can just scrape into e4, have my fingers and toes crossed!! good luck everyone in...

i'll die of shame if i get under... 85.00 i won't tell anyone what i got if i get less than.... 90.00 i will be satisfied with over... 93.00 i'll be bloody estatic with over... 98.00

man, you are making me feel even worse now , i was disgusted by paper 2 questions, "how language influence the way we relate to others and world"? wtf, ive never come across these sort of questions b4. and what is that "information sheet"? man, i totally stuffed up.......... still hoping for...

i thought it was one mark for the technique and one mark for example and effect, thats why i only had two techniques, the question was not that clear, those stupid hsc examiners!! :angry:

i just went through the paper again, as far as i can see, in section 1 you are not asked to compare texts but are required to refer to at least two texts in that "motivational" speech. however for section 2, making connections between the texts is essential in order to a good mark. hope that...

aos -- area of study (journey)

i bet you have absolutely no idea of what this thread is about, how the hell can you pass the exam in MAY!! and do we ever have a "higher intermidiate level" in esl? i highly doubt that.....

lol, looks like someones being jealous here, esl is a course specially designed for ppl who come to australia for less than 5 yrs, it is intended to give everyone a fair go. some esl candidates might be more competent but do you realise how much effort they have put into it?? and what about...

you are not even doing esl, what a liar?! i saw your post in the advance english forum.