ur_inner_child
.%$^!@&^#(*!?.%$^?!.
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2004
- Messages
- 6,084
- Gender
- Female
- HSC
- 2004
First of all, I do not imply any racism through what I am posting. But I was wondering if any of you could shed light to my ignorance about Aborigines.
Consider their benefits. Too many aboriginal people I know abuse these benefits, such as spending the money on drugs, harder drugs, alcohol, and what not. What's the point?
I do realise there are exceptions, and that other Aborigines use the funding wisely, but what is it for? Did someone make a huge assumption that most Aborigines are in financial hardship? Because some aren't. Or is it to make up for all the shit things that happened to their ancestors?
I see a contradiction here because if the funding is "paying back" for what happened in the past, yet they fight for equality and all those wonderful things amongst a Western society, how could that work? If you're getting benefits for BEING ABORIGINAL, does that not mean you are treated DIFFERENTLY? Thus NOT equal? Why do you need to tell the BOS about whether you're Aboriginal/Torres Strait? Again, is that survey-stuff or for giving them benefits?
What are the standards for funding Aborigines? I know a guy who is I think 1/8 or 1/16th of an Aboriginal, he looks incredibly anglo-saxon, and you would not pick the Aboriginal blood in him. Yet he gets funding. Does he even know what it's for? And yes, he spends it on drugs, drugs and more drugs.
I'm not critisizing Aborigines, I'm curious about the intentions of funding them in the first place. I'm not having a whine, because if the funding is justified (and someone can educate me here), then I have no problem with it. I'm just weirded out by some of the cases that receive funding and benefits.
Consider their benefits. Too many aboriginal people I know abuse these benefits, such as spending the money on drugs, harder drugs, alcohol, and what not. What's the point?
I do realise there are exceptions, and that other Aborigines use the funding wisely, but what is it for? Did someone make a huge assumption that most Aborigines are in financial hardship? Because some aren't. Or is it to make up for all the shit things that happened to their ancestors?
I see a contradiction here because if the funding is "paying back" for what happened in the past, yet they fight for equality and all those wonderful things amongst a Western society, how could that work? If you're getting benefits for BEING ABORIGINAL, does that not mean you are treated DIFFERENTLY? Thus NOT equal? Why do you need to tell the BOS about whether you're Aboriginal/Torres Strait? Again, is that survey-stuff or for giving them benefits?
What are the standards for funding Aborigines? I know a guy who is I think 1/8 or 1/16th of an Aboriginal, he looks incredibly anglo-saxon, and you would not pick the Aboriginal blood in him. Yet he gets funding. Does he even know what it's for? And yes, he spends it on drugs, drugs and more drugs.
I'm not critisizing Aborigines, I'm curious about the intentions of funding them in the first place. I'm not having a whine, because if the funding is justified (and someone can educate me here), then I have no problem with it. I'm just weirded out by some of the cases that receive funding and benefits.