• Want to take part in this year's BoS Trials event for Maths and/or Business Studies?
    Click here for details and register now!
  • YOU can help the next generation of students in the community!
    Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page

co-60 help (1 Viewer)

sweetangel06

New Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2005
Messages
1
hey i jus needed help why/how is cobalt 60 unstable anyone have da answer or a useful link. im lost
 

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
From my knowledge, as you go down the periodic table, the elements become more and more reactive because there are more particles bunched up together in the nucleus and this causes the atom to be very reactive. Since co-60 is someway down the table, it is fairly reactive.
 

tennille

...
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Messages
3,539
Location
Sydney
Gender
Female
HSC
2004
Cobalt-60 is unstable because there is a high neutron to proton ratio. It has 33 neutrons and only 27 protons. It is formed by bombarding Cobalt-59 with a neutron.

This web site is very good at explaining Cobalt-60:

http://www.princeton.edu/~chirata/cobalt.html



This is for Riviet:

Cobalt-60 is a radioactive form of normal cobalt, and hence isn't technically in the periodic table.

The reactivity you are referring to is ionisation energy. Ionisation energy increases from left to right of the periodic table and increases up the periodic table. This is because atoms towards the upper right of the periodic table are smaller and therefore harder to remove the electrons from the atom (hence, they are less reactive). Atoms to the lower left are much larger and cannot hold their electrons as strongly; consequently, their electrons are removed much easily meaning they are much more reactive. Normal cobalt is located towards the middle of the periodic table; it isn't really reactive.
 
Last edited:

Riviet

.
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
5,593
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Ah... i understand now, i forgot to identify that co-60 is isotope of co, it makes much more sense now.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top