MedVision ad

Complex 'show' question II (1 Viewer)

gamja

Active Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2022
Messages
118
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2023
2 things are wrong. It should be not > in the question. Also you are assuming |z|=1 which is incorrect.

Anyway you can use triangle ineqality.



Therefore and so

------

A simple example showing why you need is if . Then you will see that and so and are both 0.
It is known that .


from this and the quoted solution above (), prove by contradiction that .


Assuming that to be true,
LHS: =

and then i need to incorporate the RHS to make a contradiction... Please help!

Thank you
 

tywebb

dangerman
Joined
Dec 7, 2003
Messages
2,182
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
I'd be more inclined to do it by contrapositive





This is a neater way to do it than by contradiction.

However it can be reconstructed as a proof by contradiction by saying



 
Last edited:

gamja

Active Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2022
Messages
118
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2023
Oh I get is now - i did the contradiction proof wrong by assuming the wrong statement :oldmad: thanks tywebb
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top