Crim Law I stress - Court Research Report (2 Viewers)

[Frigid]

i reckon mine's crappy. what think you guys?

 

[spell check]

seems fine to me

you could possibly have mentioned your own observations a bit more

 

[santaslayer]

OMFG, I did something of similar shit-ness on McBarnet's views a week ago. Fuck why didn't you put this up earlier?

On a similar note, are you sure everyone has handed their's in yet? Some lucky bastard might get their filthy hands on it. (If it's handed in late).

 

[santaslayer]

What text do you people use?

We use Brown et al...
materials and commentary on criminal law and process of nsw...something like that anyway.

 

[MoonlightSonata]

seems fine to me

you could possibly have mentioned your own observations a bit more

yeh I agree

but apart from that it's good..well researched


I'll be up for a few more hours

 

[MoonlightSonata]

What text do you people use?

We use Brown et al...
materials and commentary on criminal law and process of nsw...something like that anyway.

Yeh so do we

(Brown and Egger, 2 of the authors, are 2 of our crim lecturers. David Brown is a great lecturer, and he's really nice too.)

 

[spell check]

I'll be up for a few more hours

word to that

hello sunrise

 

[MoonlightSonata]

I should note that the people who got good marks in crim 1 did not take the typical doreen approach. Simply because everyone did it.

lol what is this doreen approach you speak of.. is it heavily criticising the reading material?

 

[santaslayer]

Yeh so do we

(Brown and Egger, 2 of the authors, are 2 of our crim lecturers. David Brown is a great lecturer, and he's really nice too.)

Ditto. We have McNamara. He speaks like he writes. I hate that.

Next time people, make sure you post ALL your work up ASAP so I can do some plagarising. Thank you in advance.

 

[MoonlightSonata]

Is it due tomorrow?

I was a bit cut on that assessment. Alex steel said something along the lines of 'this is excellent but it seems artificial'

Weird contradictory teacher comments. He just didnt give anyone that used doreen good super high marks.

yeh that is weird... don't know how to interpret that one

does that means your analysis was good but (a) it was a bit forced, (b) a bit abstract, (c) applying the theory to the observations was a bit incongruent?

 

[MoonlightSonata]

McBarnett, Doreen. Two teirs of justice.

Ah good, cause I'm not doing that

BTW Frigid who do you have as your teacher? I hope she/he is not anal with your referencing.

Op cit and such is not allowed!

Haha yeh, my lecturer co-wrote the Legal Research book - so I have been very careful to adhere to that heh

 

[stamos]

Alex steel said something along the lines of 'this is excellent but it seems artificial'

if i said that to you, it'd mean that i thought you made up anecdotes to suit your argument

 

[stamos]

i'm saying that he thought you were a liar, not me

 

[Frigid]

I should note that the people who got good marks in crim 1 did not take the typical doreen approach. Simply because everyone did it.

*REWRITES WHOLE ASSIGNMENT*

edit: WTF OP CIT IS NOT USED AT UNSW!?!

FUCKFUCKFUCKFUCKFUCK... I FOLLOWED THE GUIDELINES IN MY UTS LAW ESSAY GUIDELINES BOOKLET.. THAT"S JUST GAYY MAN...

 

[stamos]

stop complaining frigid i'm not even half finished yet

 

[Frigid]

stop complaining frigid i'm not even half finished yet

that makes you only 4hrs behind me. there's more than 4hrs to dawn man. get the hell of BoS and do your assignment!

 

[sugared plum]

are you seriously re-writing it??

 

[Frigid]

are you seriously re-writing it??

nah i went to bed

crim suxx

 

[stamos]

incidentally i'm still awake and going strong

 

[Newbie]

lol!
i fell asleep at like 1