how accurate is uaiseeker 2003 reverse edition? (1 Viewer)

[~TeLEpAtHeTiC~]

hey just wondering i got uai seeker 2003
and i was wondering bout what i should be aiming for in each subject for my uai so i used the reverse edition..
i wanna get over 98
i entered that and this is what it gave me according to my strengths in subjects
physics (strong) - 86.7
chemistry (weak) - 75.6
biology (very strong) - 93.8
2u SOR (very strong) - 87.2
adv english (strong) - 87.1
the above are all aligned marks and they are if i wanna get 98 as a uai
just wondering how reliable are the numbers and secondly is it the aligned mark i should be aiming for? thats what i read in the manual but it seemed weird..plz explain.
thanx everyone
good luck for trials

 

[pri]

thats dodge...

Is UAI seeker that accurate because the marks it gives me to aim for are pretty low too, and I put in uai 99.75!

 

[enak]

Can u put in my marks in!
UAI want 95
SDD(vstrong)
ENG(strong)
Mat3u(weak)
Mat4u(weak)
Chem(uh strong)

 

[pri]

umm its personalised, unless u did the same subs as me, it wouldnt work

 

[enak]

ohh, damn. ok, ill go buy one

 

[~TeLEpAtHeTiC~]

nah they are aligned marks
my scaled marks for each of them if my uai is to be 98 is
physics (strong) - 87
chemistry (weak) - 75.4
biology (very strong) - 92.8
2U SOR (very strong) - 92.8
adv english (strong) - 87
the above are scaled hsc marks..
as opposed to my other post which had aligned hsc marks

 

[Lazarus]

It is accurate, but notice that the percentile which each mark equates to varies wildly between the different years.

Most people don't really have a good grasp of how aligned HSC marks reflect performance, and attempt to compare them to the marks they've been getting at school and so on - this is unfortunate, because it makes the estimating process all the more difficult, but it's something we have to live with...