How the f-ck do u do this question (1 Viewer)

blackbunny

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
466
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
deternime all real numbers k so that the following pairs of vectors are othogonal

u=(k,1,-2) v=(k,-3,k)
 

acmilan

I'll stab ya
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
3,989
Location
Jumanji
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Um vectors isnt in 3 unit, especially when they are in 3 dimensions
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
If they're orthogonal then you could probably deal with them in terms of a plane couldn't you? Then you could prove that m1= -1/m2 gradient sorta thing. That's the best I can offer without having done vectors.

P.S This really isn't 3-unit stuff, you should post this either on the 4-unit (extracurricular) board or on the Vic Specialist board.
 

acmilan

I'll stab ya
Joined
May 24, 2004
Messages
3,989
Location
Jumanji
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Vectors are orthogonal if their dot products = 0 ie v.u = 0 which makes them perpendicular. However it is beyond the 3 unit course so ill move it to 4 unit.
 

illucid

New Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2004
Messages
14
Location
Blacktown
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Useless?.....

You got told how to solve it. It just means that where u.v = 0 then it is considered orthogonal (the lines are perpendicular)
...... Easy (beyond 3u but not too much so).
 

maths > english

Rejected Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
85
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
The attached thing is to help explain the first part.

btw 3D diagrams havent been in the 3u course for about 30 years
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
This is just me being unecesarily picky but where you were writing 'respectfully' did you mean to use respectively as in: 'in the order mentioned '? I just haven't seen/heard respectfully used like that unless you were intending to make it a very polite proof :p.
 

bhavo

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
32
there is an easier nmethod... much easier.

to prove the dot product = 0, all you hafta do is multiply all the co-effs of the position verctors.

in english, that translates to, make a postion vector of point u and v, and multiply the corresponding co-effs of the 2 vectors.

here it is:

u: ki + j -2k
v: ki -3k + kk

where i, j, k are the postion vectors along the 3 axis, x, y, z.

now as acmilan poiunted out, of vectors are perpendicular their dotproduct = 0.

so when u multiply the coeffs and add em up, u solve that eqn:

coeff of vector i: k x k
coeff of vector j: -3 x 1
coeff of vector k: -2 x k

adding up gives u k^2 -2k -3, and that = 0

therefore k= -1 or 3.
 
Last edited:

maths > english

Rejected Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
85
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2004
i think my explanation may have appeared much more complicated than it needed to be because the formula:

cosθ=cosα<sub>1</sub>cosα<sub>2</sub>+cosβ<sub>1</sub>cosβ<sub>2</sub>+cosγ<sub>1</sub>cosγ<sub>2</sub>

is a general one normally applied without explanation

i explained the formula because the person who asked the question was probably a hsc student who had never seen it before and because i didnt want to encourage them to blindly apply formulas without an understanding of what they were doing
 

m_isk

Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2004
Messages
158
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
illucid said:
(beyond 3u but not too much so).
not so much so?? this is waaaaaaaaaayyy beyond the 3u and probably slightly beyond 4 as well...
 

bhavo

Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
32
yeah its uni stuff. at least i learnt for the first time in uni. good 'ole MATH1902 (linear algebra).

its quite simple once u use the formula, but the explanantion involves learning all the stuff before, esp about position vectors, and 3D space, and the all the angles relative to the 3 axis.

not to difficult actually, if they taught it in 4U, most of the students would have probably understood it easily.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top