• Want to help us with this year's BoS Trials?
    Let us know before 30 June. See this thread for details
  • Looking for HSC notes and resources?
    Check out our Notes & Resources page

Induction question (1 Viewer)

Giant Lobster

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
1,322
Location
asdads
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
For those questions asking u to prove stuff like n lines making n^2 + n + 1 regions etc (not sure if thats right but thats no matter) do u deduce a recursive relation between u_n+1 and u_n before starting the induction process? Ive always known that as the way to do those induction questions, as its required in step 3 but im not sure how other ppl do it.

(e.g. u_n+1 = u_n + n + 1 (following some reasoning on why))
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
I've seen something similar, but I think I may be talking about something completely different. For example, you're given:

T_n+1 = T_n + n + 1 (From your question)

Then you derive something to make it:

T_n+1 = f(n)

Where f(n) is purely in n with no T_n's at all...
 

turtle_2468

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
408
Location
North Shore, Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
yes you do get a recursive relation in order to prove step 3. It'd go something like this: (this is the long, ultra-rigorous version, shorten as desired)
Observe that one line with no intersection creates 1 new region. (dividing the plane into 2) Furthermore note that for each intersection the new line has with another line, an additional region is created. Therefore the (k+1)-th line (assuming no parallel lines and thus k intersections) creates k+1 new regions. So u_(k+1)=u_k+k+1 as you wrote.

by the way, keypad, the deriving process in general is extremely hard :)
 

Giant Lobster

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
1,322
Location
asdads
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
yes you do get a recursive relation in order to prove step 3.
Thanks but im referring to those questions where they dont give you any relation, but ask you straight out, prove u_n = f(n). In that case must I deduce a recursive relation myself before commencing induction, or is there another way?
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
The recursive relationship should already be given to you as it defines u_n. It may be given to you in words, but you get the words that define u_n, and change that into a recursive formula involving u_n, u_(n-1) etc.

Then you assume true for n = k
Then for n = k+1 convert the

u_(k+1) into something which uses u_k.

Then the formula can be subbed into the u_k part.
 

KeypadSDM

B4nn3d
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Messages
2,631
Location
Sydney, Inner West
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Originally posted by turtle_2468
by the way, keypad, the deriving process in general is extremely hard :)
But they're not going to throw a toughie at you in 4 unit. If anything they always tell you what to derive.
 

Giant Lobster

Active Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2003
Messages
1,322
Location
asdads
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
Is induction ever in q8 in a souped up "enhanced" form? cos all the ones ive met are all doable... hmmm

edit:
and what of the ones where you're required to conjecture a result, then prove it by induction? will they ever become tricky?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top