MedVision ad

Inequality Proof (1 Viewer)

WeiWeiMan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Messages
1,021
Location
behind you
Gender
Male
HSC
2026
whats the restriction on a,b,c?
probably a,b,c > 0 and a≠b≠c since this looks like an application of AM/HM rearranged a bit

How to prove that
consider
(a+b+c)(1/a+1/b+1/c) > 9
(a+b)(1/a + 1/b) > 4

for LHS > MHS,
(a+b)(1/a+1/b) > 4
1/a + 1/b > 4/(a+b)
1/2(1/a + 1/b) > 2/(a+b)
similarly,

1/2(1/b+1/c) > 2/(b+c)
1/2(1/c+1/a) > 2/(c+a)
adding these, simplifying and factorising gives:

1/a + 1/b + 1/c > 2[1/(a+b) + 1/(b+c) + 1/(c+a)]
hence LHS > MHS

for MHS > RHS,
[(a+b)+(b+c)+(c+a)][1/(a+b)+1/(b+c)+1/(c+a)] > 9
2(a+b+c)[1/(a+b)+1/(b+c)+1/(c+a)] > 9
2[1/(a+b)+1/(b+c)+1/(c+a)] > 9/(a+b+c)

hence
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top