Integral Proof (1 Viewer)

nightweaver066

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2010
Messages
1,585
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Numerator becomes

Split the fraction in to two, factorise denominator as difference of two squares and simplify.

One function is odd so that becomes 0, other one becomes

As x -> infinity,

As x-> -infinity,

Evaluating the integral, you get
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,393
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Being somewhat 'rigorous', first split the integral first to account for the undefined bits



First note that



So applying this result to the definite integrals we get



But (not sure if this is well justifed)



Hence we are left with



which equals



The reason I wouldn't evaluate that integral directly is because the function is undefined at x = -1 and x = 1 so you need to separate the different cases and test for convergence. There are examples where if you integrate across a point which is not defined for the integrand, you get an incorrect answer.
 
Last edited:

seanieg89

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
2,662
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
The 1 and -1 are no problem here as they are removable singularities. It is understood that you just give the integrand the value that would make it continuous there.

In fact you could take a continuous function on the interval [a,b] and change it at a countable number of points without changing the fact that it is Riemann integrable and without changing the value of its integral.

That said, I do not like the wording of the question because it is essentially asking students to find the Cauchy Principal Value of the given integral without explicitly saying so. As written, the improper integral is not well defined. Eg if we integrated from -a to 2a and let a->inf we would get a different value for our integral, which would not happen with a convergent improper integral on R.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top