MedVision ad

Intel CPU model numbers (1 Viewer)

jm1234567890

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
6,516
Location
Stanford, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
ARRRGGGG

they are so confusing, what kind of idiot came up with them...

they should have stayed with GHz, and let amd try match their model numbers to them....

I mean, if i said I had a 353 CPU, you would have no idea what that was.
 

Collin

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
5,084
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Well remember, there are many CPU architectures, so clock speed becomes irrelevant to certain respects.

Desktop Processor Family/ Number Sequence
Intel® Pentium® 4 processor (including the Intel® Pentium® 4 processor supporting Hyper-Threading Technology and Intel® Pentium® 4 processor with HT Technology) 5xx
Intel® Celeron® D processor 3xx

Mobile Processor Family/ Number Sequence
Intel® Pentium® M processor 7xx
Intel® Pentium® M processor Low Voltage (or LV) 7xx
Intel® Pentium® M processor Ultra Low Voltage (or ULV) 7xx
Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 processor (including the Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 processor supporting Hyper-Threading Technology and Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 processor with HT Technology) 5xx
Intel® Celeron® M processor 3xx
Intel® Celeron® M processor Ultra Low Voltage (or ULV) 3xx

Same thing with AMD chips, where now they're slowly phasing out the 754 socket CPUs as a lower-end user range while the higher enders go for the 939s.. so you hear people saying 'you can actually choose different types of e.g Athlon 64 3000+??'

If you think the CPU designations are confusing, try learning ATi and Nvidia's notation for their video cards. ATi recently ran out of room for their Radeon cards (upto 9800XT), so they started the X300 up to X800XT range.. and some people got pretty confused.
Same deal with the Nvidia FX series (after the Geforce 4800 Tit), they suddenly introduced the 6800.

It gets pretty annoying eh? :D
 

Winston

Active Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2002
Messages
6,128
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
Originally posted by jm1234567890
ARRRGGGG

they are so confusing, what kind of idiot came up with them...

they should have stayed with GHz, and let amd try match their model numbers to them....

I mean, if i said I had a 353 CPU, you would have no idea what that was.

I have to agree with you there, it's stupid naming conventions, AMD makes it the most misleading, i hear dickheads, saying a 2500 xp is 2.5 Ghz, like grow a freakin brain. However this sort of naming does distinguish the dumbasses to the erudite ones.
 

sunny

meh.
Joined
Jul 7, 2002
Messages
5,350
Gender
Male
HSC
2002
Whatever it takes to make the people spend money...



'P4......Exxxxxtreeeemmeeeee Edition!'
 

jm1234567890

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
6,516
Location
Stanford, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Originally posted by JKDDragon
Well remember, there are many CPU architectures, so clock speed becomes irrelevant to certain respects.

Desktop Processor Family/ Number Sequence
Intel® Pentium® 4 processor (including the Intel® Pentium® 4 processor supporting Hyper-Threading Technology and Intel® Pentium® 4 processor with HT Technology) 5xx
Intel® Celeron® D processor 3xx

Mobile Processor Family/ Number Sequence
Intel® Pentium® M processor 7xx
Intel® Pentium® M processor Low Voltage (or LV) 7xx
Intel® Pentium® M processor Ultra Low Voltage (or ULV) 7xx
Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 processor (including the Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 processor supporting Hyper-Threading Technology and Mobile Intel® Pentium® 4 processor with HT Technology) 5xx
Intel® Celeron® M processor 3xx
Intel® Celeron® M processor Ultra Low Voltage (or ULV) 3xx

Same thing with AMD chips, where now they're slowly phasing out the 754 socket CPUs as a lower-end user range while the higher enders go for the 939s.. so you hear people saying 'you can actually choose different types of e.g Athlon 64 3000+??'

If you think the CPU designations are confusing, try learning ATi and Nvidia's notation for their video cards. ATi recently ran out of room for their Radeon cards (upto 9800XT), so they started the X300 up to X800XT range.. and some people got pretty confused.
Same deal with the Nvidia FX series (after the Geforce 4800 Tit), they suddenly introduced the 6800.

It gets pretty annoying eh? :D
Intel® Celeron® M processor 3xx
Intel® Celeron® M processor Ultra Low Voltage (or ULV) 3xx

Intel® Celeron® D processor 3xx

That is my point... the mobile celerons have nothing to do with the desktop ones....

The socket 754 will be used for the semprons
socket 939 will be used for future CPUs
I don't think there will be much overlap
unlike the the P4 3GHz C,D,E,EE

Yeah, vid cards are also confusing, but that is cause manufacturers customise their boards.

the 9600 128meg i got was acctually a 9600SE and some 9600LE are the same as regular 9600s????

then the XT in nVidia cards mean slow, while in ATi it mean fast...
 

Collin

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
5,084
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Originally posted by jm1234567890
the 9600 128meg i got was acctually a 9600SE and some 9600LE are the same as regular 9600s????

then the XT in nVidia cards mean slow, while in ATi it mean fast...
In general for the ATi Radeon series, it goes SE, (nothing), PRO and then XT. Really you should just stay away from the SEs and go for the PRO versions. SEs are like the MX versions of the Geforce 4s. Highly annoying.

And yeah, for the Nvidias the XT means something different completely. After I got my upgrade 2 years ago, I stopped looking up video card progress for about a year and a half.. and so was horrifically confused when I came back to hardware. It sucked lol.

And apparently SAPPHIRE has created fury by selling ATi Radeon 128MB PROs when they were actually 128bit, not 256. So if you ever buy a SAPPHIRE Radeon, if it says 'ATLANTIS', then it's cheapass, but it's only 128bit. Trap.

Oh and did you know that both Nvidia and ATi has been caught cheating in benchmarks? Haha, I had no clue about this till last night.
 

Winston

Active Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2002
Messages
6,128
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
haha you hardware freaks :p... i so swear i use to be so up to date with it, but heck i hate reading it, primarily because im too povo to even upgrade :p
 

Collin

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
5,084
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Originally posted by Winston
haha you hardware freaks :p... i so swear i use to be so up to date with it, but heck i hate reading it, primarily because im too povo to even upgrade :p
You're exactly the same with me mate, I bought my 3rd comp 2 years ago.. so I went pov again.. so I don't look at hardware for another few years.. and then when I get money again I get back into it. Confused of course. :D
 

+Po1ntDeXt3r+

Active Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2003
Messages
3,527
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2003
im shopping for a new one..

umm but with the intel numbering i think its fair..

like with ppl how do u justify that the Cpu speed isnt the only factor in the performance.. like with the centrino tech.. id hav to say bout 80% of dept store customers (about 45% of real/average consumers) would not realise that running a 1.8Ghz centrino will wipe out a 2.4Ghz P4 under certain conditions..esp business apps..
its just intel way of making more dough n letting the customers kno.. and chuckin a AMD lolz
cmon sif like all the bus speeds on the RAM, CPU, MoBo dun make a different?

btw.. intels P4 EE are nuts for a PC.. FSB 800..start from lik 3.2Ghz... 2mb L2 caches.. :| .. oooOOOOOOOoooooOOOOoooo
 
Last edited:

Collin

Active Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2003
Messages
5,084
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Remember people, for games the Intel Pentium chips with Hyper-Threading technology doesn't really boost performance. It only really helps multi-tasking.
Many times I've heard people saying how they're getting a new P4 chip, for the new flashy FPS games coming out soon and justify it over an AMD selection by using the 'Hyper-Threading claim'.

And yes, Centrino rocks. Dothan, especially. Similar principle to the AMD chips in general.. like when AMD first became really REALLY prominant most of my friends got confused when I told them that the 2000+ XP actually had a clock speed of 1666MHz.
 

SoCal

Hollywood
Joined
Jul 5, 2003
Messages
3,913
Location
California
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Is this following summary for desktop computers correct:

Intel Pentium 4 Processor Extreme Edition 3.40 GHz

Intel Pentium 4 Processor 560 3.60 GHz
Intel Pentium 4 Processor 550 3.40 GHz
Intel Pentium 4 Processor 540 3.20 GHz
Intel Pentium 4 Processor 530 3.00 GHz
Intel Pentium 4 Processor 520 2.80 GHz

:).
 

AsyLum

Premium Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2002
Messages
15,899
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
*looks confuzzled*

*looks @ his 2100+ running as a 2900*

*me wonders if he needs another fan to add to the 4 in there atm*

*gets distracted by the pretty blue lights*

*wonders what he was doing*
 

redslert

yes, my actual brain
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
2,373
Location
Behind You!!
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
Originally posted by AsyLum
*looks confuzzled*

*looks @ his 2100+ running as a 2900*

*me wonders if he needs another fan to add to the 4 in there atm*

*gets distracted by the pretty blue lights*

*wonders what he was doing*
do you have a mini-twister in your case? lol
and does it sound like fighter jet taking off
 

MicK_eT

Terry mate!
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
287
Location
south west sydney
im confused.... so what are the mainstream amd and intel processors cuz isnt intel releasing a new one again soon..? like whoa.. totally confused.. i can keep up with graphics cuz thats seems like yea wateva.. but like u got the cpus n then the mopthereboards taht use all these diff types of chipsets gaaaaa~..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top