financialwar
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2012
- Messages
- 607
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- HSC
- N/A
http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30346903
So Watson had to sell his Nobel prize because of a remark he made about black people have on average a lower IQ, which is political incorrect but true (Well Asians have small penis, black have lower IQ, if you're offended, I really don't care), he might be detested by the general public, but why should be scientific community also ostracised him? Isn't science all about finding the truth, without giving in into political correctness of different cultures or social bias?
Why is it political incorrect to talk about the disadvantage of black when we talk about their advantage almost freely, especially about their physical prowess.
ps. if anyone has the link to that interview with Watson and his comment on blacks?
So Watson had to sell his Nobel prize because of a remark he made about black people have on average a lower IQ, which is political incorrect but true (Well Asians have small penis, black have lower IQ, if you're offended, I really don't care), he might be detested by the general public, but why should be scientific community also ostracised him? Isn't science all about finding the truth, without giving in into political correctness of different cultures or social bias?
Why is it political incorrect to talk about the disadvantage of black when we talk about their advantage almost freely, especially about their physical prowess.
ps. if anyone has the link to that interview with Watson and his comment on blacks?
