Mathematical Induction questions (1 Viewer)

P

pLuvia

Guest
Prove he following statements by mathematical induction, where n is a natural number

1+2(2) + 3(2^2) + ..... n(2^n-1) = 1 +(n-1) 2^n

i got up to this answer

1 + 2^k (2k)

is that wrong? :(
 

Pace_T

Active Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2004
Messages
1,784
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kadlil said:
Prove he following statements by mathematical induction, where n is a natural number

1+2(2) + 3(2^2) + ..... n(2^n-1) = 1 +(n-1) 2^n

i got up to this answer

1 + 2^k (2k)

is that wrong? :(
1 + 2^k (2k) = 1+ 2.k.2^k = 1 + k.2^(k+1)

now, in the original equaiton if n = k+ 1, RHS is 1 + k.2^(k+1)
which is the same, so its right i think
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
Where n is a natural number

41^n - 1 is divisible by 20

My working:

S(n) = 41^n - 1
When n = 1
S(1) = 40
Assume S(k) is divisible by 20
S(k) = 41^k - 1 = 20N [ Where N is an integer]
S(k+1) = 41^k+1 - 1
= 41(41^k) - 1
= 41(20N+1) - 1
= ???

What can I do now?
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kadlil said:
= 41(20N+1) - 1
= ???

What can I do now?
= 41(20N+1) - 1
= 20(41N) + 41 - 1
= 20(41N) + 40
= 20(41N + 2)
= 20R, where R is an integer
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
81(32n) - 22n is divisible by 5, where n is a natural number
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kadlil said:
81(32n) - 22n is divisible by 5, where n is a natural number
Skipping past that n= 1 stuff... Let S<sub>n</sub> be the proposition that 81(32n) - 22n is divisible by 5 i.e. that

81(32n) - 22n = 5M (where M is an integer)

Assume true for n = k

81(32k) - 22k = 5Q (multiply through by [4][9])

4.81(3<sup>2k+2</sup>) - 9.(2<sup>2k+2</sup>) = 5(36Q)

81(3<sup>2k+2</sup>) - (2<sup>2k+2</sup>) = 5(36Q) - (243.3<sup>2k+2</sup> - 8.2<sup>2k+2</sup>)


RHS = 5(36Q) - (2187.3<sup>2k</sup> - 32.2<sup>2k</sup>)

= 5(36Q) - 27(81.3<sup>2k</sup> - 2<sup>2k</sup>) + 5.2<sup>2k</sup>

= 5(36Q) - 5(27Q) + 5(2<sup>2k</sup>)
= 5R , where R is an integer.

hence 81(3<sup>2k+2</sup>) - (2<sup>2k+2</sup>) = 5R

&there4; S<sub>k</sub> ==> S<sub>k+1</sub> etc...
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
81(32k) - 22k = 5Q (multiply through by [4][9])

4.81(32k+2) - 9.(22k+2) = 5(36Q)

81(32k+2) - (22k+2) = 5(36Q) - (243.32k+2 - 8.22k+2)
Why did you multiply it through by [4][9]
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kadlil said:
Why did you multiply it through by [4][9]
To transform the S<sub>k</sub> case into the S<sub>k+1</sub> case.

3<sup>2k</sup> x 9 = 3<sup>2(k+1)</sup>

2<sup>2k</sup> x 4 = 2<sup>2(k+1)</sup>

In the question you have 81(3<sup>2k</sup>) - 2<sup>2k</sup> and you have to make up the powers to 2(k+1) = 2k + 2 somehow so I multiplied through by 4x9. There's no point taking 9 out of 81 because then you have to make it 81 again by multiplying by nine :p.
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
oh okz, but can't you just make all the "k"s into "k+1" by substitution? That's the the way I learnt it :p
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
This is what I did,

Assuming S(k) is divisible by 5
S(k) = 81(32k) - 22k = 5N [ where N is an integer]
S(k+1)
= 81(32k+2) - 22k+2
= 81.32k.32 - 22k.22
= 81.32k.9 - (81(32k) - 5N).4 [Sub 22k = 81(32k - 5N)

Now I don't know what to do here?
 

KFunk

Psychic refugee
Joined
Sep 19, 2004
Messages
3,323
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
kadlil said:
= 81.32k.9 - (81(32k) - 5N).4 [Sub 22k = 81(32k - 5N)

Now I don't know what to do here?
= 81.32k.9 - (81(32k) - 5N).4

= 9.(81)(32k) - 4.(81)(32k) + 5(4N)

= 5.(81)(32k) + 5(4N)

= 5T ... where T is an integer.

The step that you're missing each time is just rearranging terms so that you can take out a factor of five. It was the same deal above for divisibility by 20.
 
P

pLuvia

Guest
Ok, thanks for pointing that out, I'll take that into account next time :p
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top