How is 5 not C?My answers. Some are wrong, but the majority should be right
5. B (The answer is B, however I put C)
17. C (Confirmed that the answer is C)
Are you sure it wasn't traditional?How is 5 not C?
and I'm pretty sure that 17 is Agile approach not participant dev.
Well according to my teacher, 5 involves a Star network AND a Wireless network... therefore being a Hybrid.How is 5 not C?
and I'm pretty sure that 17 is Agile approach not participant dev.
It can't be traditional as it can progress back to another step... and traditional development characteristics suggest that they can only move forward and can't revisit previous steps.Are you sure it wasn't traditional?
yeh i think it was traditional since it's a large development and is broken into steps..Well according to my teacher, 5 involves a Star network AND a Wireless network... therefore being a Hybrid.
Also for 17, my teacher said it was C, as I didn't think it would be agile, as it still has some sort of structure, and still follows some flow. Also the "is another feature requesting" suggests that participants are involved in the creation of the system.
You're right, but this was like at the end of the project, they then asked if they wanted any additional features, if yes, then they'll do to the project again step by step in linear order adding the additional feature.It can't be traditional as it can progress back to another step... and traditional development characteristics suggest that they can only move forward and can't revisit previous steps.
Participant development is when the user develops the system based on their needs and wants... So i doubt it was participant. But don't take my word .You're right, but this was like at the end of the project, they then asked if they wanted any additional features, if yes, then they'll do to the project again step by step in linear order adding the additional feature.
I also don't understand how it's participant development.. All they did was say yes or no if they wanted an additional feature, it's not like they really put a great deal of input into it
Wouldn't participant development have them involved in most of the steps, not just the end?
yeh i think it was traditional since it's a large development and is broken into steps..
I'm pretty sure it is not Traditional because it is missing the design stage and the "Is another feature requested?" part gives it away. Agile approach has a lot of client involvement so they would be asking for features mid-way through the development as the problems arise/desire for features.Are you sure it wasn't traditional?
Last time I checked, "Wireless network" isn't a network topology. The network topologies are: star, ring, bus and hybrid. If it is hybrid then it has to be a mix of at least 2 of those topologies.Well according to my teacher, 5 involves a Star network AND a Wireless network... therefore being a Hybrid.
Also for 17, my teacher said it was C, as I didn't think it would be agile, as it still has some sort of structure, and still follows some flow. Also the "is another feature requesting" suggests that participants are involved in the creation of the system.