new pc (1 Viewer)

blackbunny

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2004
Messages
466
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
is this good

cpu
amd 939 3200+

video card
128M Asus 6600GT SLI

hdd
Seagate 8M SATA 250G $199 2x

cd
lite on cdr

dvd
Lite on Retail 16x Dual Layer DVD-RW–w/4x Dual Layer

ram
512M DDR400(Kingston) $103 2x

edit:
CPU
amd 939 3200+
AMD Athlon64-939 3500+

VIDEO CARD
128M Asus 6600GT SLI
128M XFX 6600GT SLI
128M G-B 6600GT SLI / 6600GT SLI VIVO
128M Leadtek 6600GT SLI/6600GT Extreme
256M GIGA-BYTE 6800GT
256M Leadtek 6800GT / 6800 Ultra

HDD
Seagate 8M SATA 250G $199 2x
W.D. 8M SATA 250G

CD
lite on cdr

DVD
Lite on Retail 16x Dual Layer DVD-RW–w/4x Dual Layer
Pioneer 109 Beige D.L. 16X DVD RW Drive Only (Australia)

RAM
512M DDR400(Kingston)
1G PC3200 DDR400 Hyundai

MOBO
A8N-SLI Deluxe PCI-E
 
Last edited:

JimmyK

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
338
Location
Narrabeen, Sydney/Maitland, Hunter Valley
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
seems like a fair deal to me. the mobo to support all that shouldnt cost you more than arround $170.
If i was you id try and get a sony Dual Layer DVD burner - they are more expensive, but you are almots garunteed of the finished burn working anywhere. thats just my experience. and besides.. sony was one of the inventors of the DVD!
Lite-on for CD burners are good value though!
That CPU price is extremely good (its even lower than my wholesale distributor price!!).
 

JimmyK

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
338
Location
Narrabeen, Sydney/Maitland, Hunter Valley
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
not from my experience they arent - some noticeable quality differences on *some* burns. I must admit though.. we ahve a lite on dvd burner.. we havent used it to burn dvds.. but i have seen comparisions between sony burnt DVDs and compeiting (non DVD founding) brands.
 

ReaveR

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2003
Messages
746
Location
Killara
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
One of them is just a rebadge of the other - I have a suspicious feeling Sony are rebadged Lite-on's too, because you can flash some Sony single layer drives with some firmware designed for Lite-ons to turn them into dual layer drives. Sony's not the only brand as well, seem to remember.
 

ReaveR

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2003
Messages
746
Location
Killara
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
I don't see any point in getting two raptors in a home setup.
Significantly reduced storage for...what exactly? Less vibration that's not going to be noticed? Slightly faster access times?
 

Templar

P vs NP
Joined
Aug 11, 2004
Messages
1,979
Gender
Male
HSC
2004
blackbunny said:
VIDEO CARD
128M Asus 6600GT SLI
128M XFX 6600GT SLI
128M G-B 6600GT SLI / 6600GT SLI VIVO
128M Leadtek 6600GT SLI/6600GT Extreme
256M GIGA-BYTE 6800GT
256M Leadtek 6800GT / 6800 Ultra
It's cheaper to get 2 6600GT in SLI than a 6800 Ultra, and it should have better performance. The Asus Extreme version is one of the best 6600GT cards.

blackbunny said:
HDD
Seagate 8M SATA 250G $199 2x
W.D. 8M SATA 250G

Doesn't make much difference for the average home user, whichever one is best for value.
 

MedNez

:o>---<
Joined
Aug 21, 2004
Messages
3,004
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
blackbunny said:
help me choose parts
Please. Help me choose parts please.

blackbunny said:
cpu
amd 939 3200+
Not an AMD fan, sorry.

blackbunny said:
video card
128M Asus 6600GT SLI
See the post above this.

blackbunny said:
hdd
Seagate 8M SATA 250G $199 2x
To be honest I think you'd be better off with 2 x 160gb drives, rather than one 1 x 250. More of a liability, and slower than a smaller driver.

Also, I've got Seagate and I'm unimpressed with their long term reliability. Go Western Digital or Maxtor.

blackbunny said:
cd
lite on cdr

dvd
Lite on Retail 16x Dual Layer DVD-RW–w/4x Dual Layer
My advice would be to get a combo driver. One that reads and writes both CDs and DVDs. Pioneer or Liteon would be my recommendations for this.

blackbunny said:
ram
512M DDR400(Kingston) $103 2x
That sounds fine.
 

jm1234567890

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
6,516
Location
Stanford, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
MedNez said:
Not an AMD fan, sorry.
i'm sorry but that give the impression that AMD chips are inferior without justification.

sure they have had reliability problems, but for some tasks they have much better value. So the choice must be made based on the proposed purpose of the system.
 

MedNez

:o>---<
Joined
Aug 21, 2004
Messages
3,004
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Personal preference. I don't go as far as to put my allegiance with Intel over all else. They may in fact be worse than AMD. Comes down to what you like using.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2004
Messages
3,550
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
Didn't the prescotts run hotter than the thunderbirds even? 100w of power the Prescott's demanded, so at a stage intel generated lots of heat

contrary to belief, AMD's and Intel's are both great, as mednez says its personal preference.
 

JimmyK

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2004
Messages
338
Location
Narrabeen, Sydney/Maitland, Hunter Valley
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
if i had my way id go for the IBM Power PC chip - but that wont be happening any time soon - although it will be the processor in the next gen xBox.. and look what apple are doing with the PowerPC's!!!
I've got an AMD chip in this computer - its good, but i think that an Intel chip would have been better. I'll have 2 get rid of my two old hard drives (40gb each) and replace it with a 80gb SATA drive along side my 120GB SATA.. and then see how the processor performs at processing music and all the sorta stuff. Then ill be able 2 make a more valid comment but at the moment im on fairly neutral ground.
 

jm1234567890

Premium Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2002
Messages
6,516
Location
Stanford, CA
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
JimmyK said:
if i had my way id go for the IBM Power PC chip - but that wont be happening any time soon - although it will be the processor in the next gen xBox.. and look what apple are doing with the PowerPC's!!!
I've got an AMD chip in this computer - its good, but i think that an Intel chip would have been better. I'll have 2 get rid of my two old hard drives (40gb each) and replace it with a 80gb SATA drive along side my 120GB SATA.. and then see how the processor performs at processing music and all the sorta stuff. Then ill be able 2 make a more valid comment but at the moment im on fairly neutral ground.
I just hope the cell chip isn't overhyped and acctually delivers, then replacese x86 :D
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top