poor judges...
Unwell? We'll be the judge of that
JUDGES will soon be forced to undergo health checks to avoid any repeat of scandals that forced the retirement of the sleeping Ian Dodd or the drink-driving Jeff Shaw.
New laws for handling complaints against judicial officers will also make it clear that the days of dealing with misbehaving judges "in house" are over.
Heads of courts will be able to order health checks if they fear a judge or magistrate suffers from "incapacity" rather than having to wait for a complaint from the public. The body which handles complaints, the NSW Judicial Commission, will also be given the power to order medical or pyschological examinations. If the judicial officer refuses, the matter can treated as a complaint - and trigger a full investigation of their "fitness for office".
The "cone of silence" that exists over the commission's activities will be lifted and complainants will be given updates on the progress of their gripes for the first time.
The amendments to the Judicial Officers Act will also abolish the categorisation of complaints as minor or serious because it was insulting to people who had serious grievances.
A draft bill is being prepared after cabinet recently approved recommendations which flowed from a review established by the Government last year.
The Attorney-General, Bob Debus, foreshadowed some of the changes at the time but the measures are tougher than expected, with the minister making it clear he wants no more Dodds or Shaws.