Perms and Combs (1 Viewer)

ihatehippos101

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2024
Messages
8
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Screenshot 2025-08-06 at 11.05.47 pm.pngScreenshot 2025-08-06 at 11.06.01 pm.png
For i), say if I fixed the parents, am I still allowed to arrange them in 2! ways?
As my answer is 2!(the two parents)*2!(group of students+teachers)*4!(teachers)*5!(students) but the answer does not account for one of the 2!
 

C2H6O

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2024
Messages
854
Gender
Male
HSC
2025
View attachment 48546View attachment 48547
For i), say if I fixed the parents, am I still allowed to arrange them in 2! ways?
As my answer is 2!(the two parents)*2!(group of students+teachers)*4!(teachers)*5!(students) but the answer does not account for one of the 2!
Im a bit rusty so not 100% sure,
But consider that swapping the parents is already accounted for if you reverse the students and the teachers, so there is no need for the last 2! as it is already accounted for in the arrangements of the teachers and students, but yeah this is a subtlety I probably wouldn’t have picked up in the exam
 

C2H6O

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2024
Messages
854
Gender
Male
HSC
2025
Im a bit rusty so not 100% sure,
But consider that swapping the parents is already accounted for if you reverse the students and the teachers, so there is no need for the last 2! as it is already accounted for in the arrangements of the teachers and students, but yeah this is a subtlety I probably wouldn’t have picked up in the exam
bruh sorry as you can tell I’m severely out of practise but I think this is the correct explanation. In your calculation you account for swapping the parents and swapping the student/teacher groups, but if you think about it this doubles up; imagine if you swap the parents from one position to the other, then rotate the table 180 degrees that’s the same as swapping the teachers and student groups
 

ihatehippos101

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2024
Messages
8
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
bruh sorry as you can tell I’m severely out of practise but I think this is the correct explanation. In your calculation you account for swapping the parents and swapping the student/teacher groups, but if you think about it this doubles up; imagine if you swap the parents from one position to the other, then rotate the table 180 degrees that’s the same as swapping the teachers and student groups
ohhhh that makes sense, thank u
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)

Top