Secondary research (1 Viewer)

[Fruitsalad]

Hey,

Ok so I have this good secondary source and in it, there is
a lot of information that supports what I'm saying. But..
this book has information also that doesn't support what I'm saying.. That is, it's a source that more kind of discusses the issue from "both sides"

The information that does support my information, can I include it?

Thanks

 

[Grim.Reaper]

I don't see why not. you can bring up the fact that it contained different info in your bibliography.

 

[Fruitsalad]

Thanks,

yeah that was my initial plan.. but I needed assurance

By the way, you are very quick at replying to responses

Again thanks