I don't do the topic, so I am not 100% sure. However a few of the dot-points seem warfare related. e.g.'technology: weapons and armor', 'Significance of fortifications...', 'significance of warrior class'. Often ambigious dotpoints are exploited.
it does kinda suck.. though this wasn't actually the worst part of the exam for me..
is there some way we could get our hands on the syllabus from before this year when it actually contained warfare?..
I still find it slightly hard to believe..