i stuffed it up... v disappointed cos i love this subject!!!
our first q was "there is no indisputable truth in history" discuss... and i really hate the whole objective argument.... i ended up arguing with the teacher saying that it's stupid to argue about truth, and that historians have more important things to debate, like WHY they do it in the first place, their purposes and such.
i don't think i'll do very well
and our case study, was "the material the historian chooses will influence their reconstruction of the past" or something like that... which was hard... seeing as i'd done so little study on my historian's sources... grrrr...
wow. nice to get that out.