To what extent does history present us with a balanced interpretation of this personality
How would you answer this question in terms of Albert Speer?
So i was thinking of making two big ideas
1. Historians in the early stage concluded that Speer was a 'good Nazi'
2. With more sources being discovered, he was actually a typical nazi criminal
And my major point is that the availability of the source determines the ability of history to present a balanced interpretation
Am i doing it right?
How would you answer this question in terms of Albert Speer?
So i was thinking of making two big ideas
1. Historians in the early stage concluded that Speer was a 'good Nazi'
2. With more sources being discovered, he was actually a typical nazi criminal
And my major point is that the availability of the source determines the ability of history to present a balanced interpretation
Am i doing it right?