Before you read, just know that you don't have to know anything about my preferred degree to answer it. I'll be very general to make it easier.
If you laughed at that question, I completely get it. However, I'm in a little bit of a dilemma as I can't determine which university would be 'better' (I'll define what makes a university better in my perspective) for me.
For some context, I want to study user experience (UX) design to ultimately become a project manager. USYD offer a course called the "Bachelor of Design (Interaction Design [https://www.sydney.edu.au/courses/c...r-of-advanced-studies-interaction-design.html] and Torrens offer a course called "Bachelor of UX and Web Design" [https://www.torrens.edu.au/courses/design/bachelor-of-ux-and-web-design]. Both courses look very appealing, but my status-oriented family are extremely against going with Torrens. Most of them are in highly regarded industries (law, medicine and finance) and believe that going to a prestigious university will land you a six-figure salary.
UX design jobs very rarely require a degree and rather focus on experience and a quality portfolio. From what I've seen with Torrens (less with USYD), they seem to really emphasise that connection with industry and the importance of a portfolio. I've brought this up before with my family, but they divert to ranking (yes, I agree that Torrens has a really shit rank in Australia) and ignore anything else. Additionally, since design is such a dynamic industry, I want all of the support I can get in a collaborative, bright environment with supportive lecturers. My friend is studying commerce at USYD and my teacher studied maths at USYD (different faculties, but hear me out). They said that due to the class sizes, they were never able to seek support and the quality of education was questionable (I prefer hands-on and practical approaches as opposed to making notes from a textbook). Finally, I absolutely hate the Wilkinson building of Design. It has some of the most uninspiring, cluttered classrooms I've ever seen in a university.
So, if Torrens is clearly in favour, why is my family so adamant about USYD? I'm learning the same stuff, I'll be on the same salary when I graduate, the facilities are better, the classrooms are smaller... but no; there is this stigma they fail to alleviate that USYD will get me a six-figure salary and the best education.
What are your thoughts? Being brought up in this status-oriented family, I am a little reluctant to label myself as someone who goes to an open, non-ATAR university; it would be nice being called a USYD student. However, at the end of the day, the university which fulfils my education needs should prevail... I guess?
If you laughed at that question, I completely get it. However, I'm in a little bit of a dilemma as I can't determine which university would be 'better' (I'll define what makes a university better in my perspective) for me.
For some context, I want to study user experience (UX) design to ultimately become a project manager. USYD offer a course called the "Bachelor of Design (Interaction Design [https://www.sydney.edu.au/courses/c...r-of-advanced-studies-interaction-design.html] and Torrens offer a course called "Bachelor of UX and Web Design" [https://www.torrens.edu.au/courses/design/bachelor-of-ux-and-web-design]. Both courses look very appealing, but my status-oriented family are extremely against going with Torrens. Most of them are in highly regarded industries (law, medicine and finance) and believe that going to a prestigious university will land you a six-figure salary.
UX design jobs very rarely require a degree and rather focus on experience and a quality portfolio. From what I've seen with Torrens (less with USYD), they seem to really emphasise that connection with industry and the importance of a portfolio. I've brought this up before with my family, but they divert to ranking (yes, I agree that Torrens has a really shit rank in Australia) and ignore anything else. Additionally, since design is such a dynamic industry, I want all of the support I can get in a collaborative, bright environment with supportive lecturers. My friend is studying commerce at USYD and my teacher studied maths at USYD (different faculties, but hear me out). They said that due to the class sizes, they were never able to seek support and the quality of education was questionable (I prefer hands-on and practical approaches as opposed to making notes from a textbook). Finally, I absolutely hate the Wilkinson building of Design. It has some of the most uninspiring, cluttered classrooms I've ever seen in a university.
So, if Torrens is clearly in favour, why is my family so adamant about USYD? I'm learning the same stuff, I'll be on the same salary when I graduate, the facilities are better, the classrooms are smaller... but no; there is this stigma they fail to alleviate that USYD will get me a six-figure salary and the best education.
What are your thoughts? Being brought up in this status-oriented family, I am a little reluctant to label myself as someone who goes to an open, non-ATAR university; it would be nice being called a USYD student. However, at the end of the day, the university which fulfils my education needs should prevail... I guess?