Tim_Shady
Member
I have to present a 5min speech on the following question -
"Using a range of primary and secondary material prsent an arguement either for or against Albert Speer as a war criminal"
Personally, from what ive read, i would say he IS a war criminal, mainly due to the creation of the concentration camps and his factories.
However, obviously there are people who don't agree with this notion otherwise there would be no topic; would there?
So what do you guys think? Just give any quick ideas u have on either the for or against
Thanks
"Using a range of primary and secondary material prsent an arguement either for or against Albert Speer as a war criminal"
Personally, from what ive read, i would say he IS a war criminal, mainly due to the creation of the concentration camps and his factories.
However, obviously there are people who don't agree with this notion otherwise there would be no topic; would there?
So what do you guys think? Just give any quick ideas u have on either the for or against
Thanks