goofyboy123
Master
so tell me what you think of that paper? was it the worse thing you have ever sat....???:angry:
ranquest said:I got 75% in 2007 practice paper but I recon I'll be lucky to get < 50% in this one.
I mean WTF I've got mates saying it was harder than the 4U paper
This is me looking at question 6 c)ii)
:jaw:
Yes, i think youre right.miche11e said:the paper was definatley different from past years, but it was still 3 unit and doable, given time.
LOL!!ChairmanZhou said:Yes, i think youre right.
The paper WAS doable.
Its just your definition of "do-able" is not one that i share.
I would need another 2 days and a solution book to finish that fuck. Aim for 20 / 84
who you? or me... oh well it doesnt matter regardless cause i too failedintuiit said:fail.
ChairmanZhou said:Yes, i think youre right.
The paper WAS doable.
Its just your definition of "do-able" is not one that i share.
I would need another 2 days and a solution book to finish that fuck. Aim for 20 / 84
same.ahhliss said:It was so hard! I calculated the marks of questions I skipped. It was 28 or something. That's not including stupid mistakes D:
heh i know where you're coming from, but it was possible to finish in the 2 hrs. I ran out of time during trials, so i made sure i didnt do the same thing this time. I actually ended up finishing 20 minutes early with about 14 marks worth of questions i couldnt do, not necessarily cos my ability is great, but cos i knew that it would take a longer time - it always does with exams, for me at least...(am i lecturing?? why??)ChairmanZhou said:Yes, i think youre right.
The paper WAS doable.
Its just your definition of "do-able" is not one that i share.
I would need another 2 days and a solution book to finish that fuck. Aim for 20 / 84
adnan91 said:wat do u guys think of the scaling this year? I rkni got around 78% raw bloody shit