-
Finished your HSC? Check out our University Discussion, Non-School forums or help out next year's HSC students! -
YOU can help the next generation of students in the community! Share your trial papers and notes on our Notes & Resources page
Why is Corby guilty? (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter go_swans
- Start date
townie
Premium Member
damnit! i wanted 2 create this threadgo_swans said:
my sharona
mrs
Asqy never took sides as to whether Schappelle Corby was guilty or not.
His point was: how can any of us say truthfully that she's innocent?
Lots of people were saying stupid things along the lines of "she's obviously innocent". It's not obvious she's innocent. That's why there's a trial.
His point was: how can any of us say truthfully that she's innocent?
Lots of people were saying stupid things along the lines of "she's obviously innocent". It's not obvious she's innocent. That's why there's a trial.
my sharona
mrs
sif you would know!go_swans said:
townie
Premium Member
how can any1 truthfully believe she's guilty?whiterabbit said:
haha so knew someone was going to make a thread like this one.
corby is guilty because she has been proven guilty in the indo court system. i base this on the fact that indonesian judges are a lot more sane than the australian public.
btw, this isn't my opinion on the case.
corby is guilty because she has been proven guilty in the indo court system. i base this on the fact that indonesian judges are a lot more sane than the australian public.
btw, this isn't my opinion on the case.
Last edited:
my sharona
mrs
I think there's more to it than we (as the general public) know.
I don't think it's fair for anyone to make statements like 'she's guilty' or 'she's innocent'.
How the fuck would YOU know?
Watching Today Tonight doesn't exactly give you an informed opinion about it.
I don't think it's fair for anyone to make statements like 'she's guilty' or 'she's innocent'.
How the fuck would YOU know?
Watching Today Tonight doesn't exactly give you an informed opinion about it.
townie
Premium Member
i dunno, it sounded like they yelled that entire judgement like madmen, did u hear them? it was scary....nekkid said:
edit: the courts r public, the public have access to the same info as judges
my sharona
mrs
I bet that's what the asylum seekers thought.go_swans said:
my sharona
mrs
While poor Schappelle sat and cried her waterproof mascara away??townie said:
A lot of asians talk loudly. It becomes habit. It doesn't mean they're deranged lunatics.
townie
Premium Member
i dont KNOW she's innocent, but i BELIEVE she is, and i think it makes sense that she is, there are no certainties in life, ever, but in MY own mind, i'm as close as u can beAsquithian said:
hiphophorray123
Banned
she is guilty because a bunch of asians say so
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
I don't think anyone knows 100% if she's guilty or innocent (Other than herself).
I would hope that under the Australian system we would of been able to work that out (testing of the drug to determine where it came from, checking the fingerprints of the inner bag).
But I feel that given the evidence presented in the Trial that an Australian court would have acquitted her.
I think we need to accept that the indonesian judges followed their laws perfectly, and were fairly lenient (under their standards) in the sentencing. It's ok to hope for a better result at an appeal or a reduction of her sentence, but anything else just sounds like some sort of racist superiority complex. Anyone calling for the president to forgive her has no respect for democracy or the separation of the powers of the judiciary and the government.
Edit: I'd be leaning towards her being guilty.
I would hope that under the Australian system we would of been able to work that out (testing of the drug to determine where it came from, checking the fingerprints of the inner bag).
But I feel that given the evidence presented in the Trial that an Australian court would have acquitted her.
I think we need to accept that the indonesian judges followed their laws perfectly, and were fairly lenient (under their standards) in the sentencing. It's ok to hope for a better result at an appeal or a reduction of her sentence, but anything else just sounds like some sort of racist superiority complex. Anyone calling for the president to forgive her has no respect for democracy or the separation of the powers of the judiciary and the government.
Edit: I'd be leaning towards her being guilty.
Last edited:
I do, shitnekkid said:
Evidence she is guilty: Drugs found in bag & a bad translation of ownership of bag=ownership of drugs
Evidence she innocent: Drugs could have gone for higher price in Syd then in Bali; Their was a drug running operartion between Bris and Syd, which Corby's bag went through, there was some (pedo) who claimed to overhear a convo about the drug plant, there were shitloads of prints on the bag of weed, the cops didnt test for DNA, etc
So why do you say she is guilty
Not-That-Bright
Andrew Quah
Korn, it's quite possible that due to the drugs in Australia being of a 'higher quality' she could have sold them for more in bali.
townie
Premium Member
i told u, for a few reasonsAsquithian said:
1. personal feelings
2. the baggage handler dispute
3. bad chain of evidence
4. corby's character, and intelligence (i.e. not stupid enough to cause i imagine a HUGE bump in her bag by putting drugs there)
so asqy, why isnt she innocent? and if u say because the court said so, i'll bitch slap u