The Cricket Thread (2 Viewers)

monesh

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2007
Messages
232
Location
livo
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
re: The Official Cricket Thread

In theory, the follow-on would be a perfect way to maintain control and mount pressure upon the opponents. But really, it just is too much for the bowlers, especially the seamers.

Think about it, having to bowl consistently at challenging pace for two days straight. It just doesn't work like that. It would be better to opt for the safter option of going back into bat and set a competitive run-chase.
yeh this makes sense. If australia loses this game i swear they should sack ponting as captain, he's to old now, can't even play the pull shot lyk he used to.
 

Mozza91

Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
373
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
re: The Official Cricket Thread

Refer that you fat bastard
 

blue_chameleon

Shake the sauce bottle yo
Joined
Mar 7, 2003
Messages
3,078
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
re: The Official Cricket Thread

By 'day', he meant Australia. :D

So with the Saffas at 5/247 and taking Lunch, have we changed our predictions?

SA need around 250 runs from the two sessions after lunch. I can't see them getting that, without taking too many chances (that I could see Aus capitalising on).

At the moment, my heart says a win for Aus, but my head is more inclined to opt for the draw with SA finishing with 8 down. I can't shake the fears of Australia's inability to take 20 wickets, even though they're in the box seat now.

EDIT: Does anyone follow the blog on FoxSports.com? Mark Waugh throwing in some interesting comments.
 

blue_chameleon

Shake the sauce bottle yo
Joined
Mar 7, 2003
Messages
3,078
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
re: The Official Cricket Thread

C'mon Aussies!!!

Duminy just out and the scoreboard now 6/268 with plenty of overs left in the day.

If they can send Morkel back cheaply and quickly, the Saffas ought to be worried.


*Sits on edge of seat*
 

superralex

Sheriosusly BHS09.
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
164
Gender
Male
HSC
2009
re: The Official Cricket Thread

saf are gone; morkel just got out.
 

u-borat

Banned
Joined
Nov 3, 2007
Messages
1,755
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
re: The Official Cricket Thread

quality bowling from siddle and johnson; impressive considering our most experienced bowler johnson only has like 20 tests
 

blue_chameleon

Shake the sauce bottle yo
Joined
Mar 7, 2003
Messages
3,078
Gender
Male
HSC
2003
re: The Official Cricket Thread

Happy to see that their great start to this 1st test wasn't spoilt.

Does McDonald stay for the 2nd test?
 

newmz89

Beer
Joined
Oct 21, 2008
Messages
238
Location
Hobart.
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
re: The Official Cricket Thread

Put Geaves in, He got a call up over to south africa didn't he?
 

Jetta

New Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
9
Location
Tweed Heads
Gender
Female
HSC
2009
re: The Official Cricket Thread

Replace MacDonald for Bracken!

However I doubt this will happen as Bracken is stuck in the ODI teams.. and only the ODI team.
 

P.T.F.E

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
333
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
re: The Official Cricket Thread

yer i knew THE AUSSIES could do it never lost faith or questioned the tatics.
just disappointed i fell asleep during lnch break =[. I can only follow it on radio stupid that its restricted to pay tv.
 

sunjet

Hip-Hop Saved My Life
Joined
Feb 24, 2004
Messages
3,059
Location
woollahra
Gender
Male
HSC
2005
re: The Official Cricket Thread

Drop Katich/McDonald.
 

P.T.F.E

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
333
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
re: The Official Cricket Thread

yer hate to say it but i think Ronnie should go. he bowled ok but not good enough to retain a place in the side.
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
210
Gender
Male
HSC
2007
re: The Official Cricket Thread

i assume macdonald is in the squad because they consider him an allrounder, not just because he can occasionally bowl well on a seaming wicket. if i were a selector i'd replace him with james hopes. he is a very underated player and much more reliable then an injury prone watson or walkabout andrew symonds.

but why include them when we have johnson, he is improving with the bat all the time. hopefully for the next test mcgain or geeves will get a call up and mcadonald gets the boot.
 

P.T.F.E

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2008
Messages
333
Gender
Male
HSC
2013
re: The Official Cricket Thread

i assume macdonald is in the squad because they consider him an allrounder, not just because he can occasionally bowl well on a seaming wicket. if i were a selector i'd replace him with james hopes. he is a very underated player and much more reliable then an injury prone watson or walkabout andrew symonds.

but why include them when we have johnson, he is improving with the bat all the time. hopefully for the next test mcgain or geeves will get a call up and mcadonald gets the boot.
yer bring in james hopes hasnt he proved himself yet?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top