Would that method be completely right? Because if z1=kiz2, then the length would be changed. i.e. if z1=2iz2, then mod z1 =/ mod z2.
Yea, but we are not dealing with mod z1 or mod z2Would that method be completely right? Because if z1=kiz2, then the length would be changed. i.e. if z1=2iz2, then mod z1 =/ mod z2.
Wouldnt it be right algebracally to take both cases, of positive and negative?
Haha, thanks for that. I intuitively tried this way.oo, nvm. Thxs for that. I was thinking graphically about a //gram.
And i must admit, that algebric way is very elegant. Very nicely done study-freak.
Thanks for the help, but I'm lost after the root.
Oops, forgot to state that the 90 degrees is not given. I'm doing this backwards.
lol, um, post the full question?Oops, forgot to state that the 90 degrees is not given. I'm doing this backwards.
mod (z1 - z2) = mod (z1 + z2)lol, um, post the full question?
That require 3unit trig functions rite? If we dont have it we cannot do it?Thanks freak. Can someone help me out here. I don't know how to finish this off.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Im trying to prove for![]()