physics/Chem final prep (2 Viewers)

jbrunero

New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
7
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Can someone answer and explain ...

14). In a titration of a strong base with a strong acid, the following procedure was used:
1. A burette was rinsed with water and then filled with the standard acid.
2. A pipette was rinsed with some base solution.
3. A conical flask was rinsed with some base solution.
4. A pipette was used to transfer a measured volume of base solution into the conical flask.
5. Indicator was added to the base sample and it was titrated to the endpoint with the acid.

Which statement is correct?
(A) The calculated base concentration will be correct.
(B) The calculated base concentration will be too low.
(C) The calculated base concentration will be too high.
(D) No definite conclusion can be reached about the base concentration
 

HyperComplexxx

ლ(ಠ_ಠ ლ)
Joined
Jan 12, 2011
Messages
460
Location
behind you
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2011
I assume its C
In 1, rinse with water then filled with acid dilutes it - it should be rinse with water, flling acid then acid added in
In 3, conical flask rinsed with base solution, adding the base solution from pipette will increase concentration of the base - it should be conical flask rinse water then add base
Looking at that, the acid is diluted so more acid will be used but since the concntration of base is incrase, even more acid will be used so C
 

Swazz

Jooocy
Joined
Mar 1, 2009
Messages
42
Location
Planet Earth
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Is it safe to assume that content from last year won't be repeated again this year?
Yes, go through the 2010 paper and pay less attention to what has been tested already. They reversed English & Maths focuses entirely;

The humanities, they tended to focus on the harder questions that was done poorly, and re-worded them this year.
Just process of elimination I guess, but each paper has even focus on all topics.
 

1981Grant

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2011
Messages
121
Location
NSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Can someone answer and explain ...

14). In a titration of a strong base with a strong acid, the following procedure was used:
1. A burette was rinsed with water and then filled with the standard acid.
2. A pipette was rinsed with some base solution.
3. A conical flask was rinsed with some base solution.
4. A pipette was used to transfer a measured volume of base solution into the conical flask.
5. Indicator was added to the base sample and it was titrated to the endpoint with the acid.

Which statement is correct?
(A) The calculated base concentration will be correct.
(B) The calculated base concentration will be too low.
(C) The calculated base concentration will be too high.
(D) No definite conclusion can be reached about the base concentration
C.
In a proper titration for this the burette should be rinsed with acid, the fact that it is not means that the acid will be slightly diluted by the water, reducing its concentration. The conical flask should also be rinsed with distilled/deionised water rather than the base solution. As it is rinsed with the base solution there will be more base in there than the desired amount.

This means that the acid will be more dilute and there will be a greater of base which means that the base's concentration will be higher.
 

jbrunero

New Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
7
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
C.
In a proper titration for this the burette should be rinsed with acid, the fact that it is not means that the acid will be slightly diluted by the water, reducing its concentration. The conical flask should also be rinsed with distilled/deionised water rather than the base solution. As it is rinsed with the base solution there will be more base in there than the desired amount.

This means that the acid will be more dilute and there will be a greater of base which means that the base's concentration will be higher.
Thanks man! Great explanation as well. :)
 

weirdguy99

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
171
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Is it better to know meissner effect or eddy current method thingy for the magnetic levitation ???

They are different shit but I was taught to talk about the opposing magnetic field due to the current in the superconductor. But meissner effect sounds more pro
The Meissner effect is completely separate to eddy current induction. If you place a magnet on a superconductor *while* it is being cooled, it will begin to rise into the air with NO initial change in magnetic flux (explained to me at USyd). The levitation occurs *only* due to the exclusion of magnetic fields.
 

abc123yoyo

Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2011
Messages
84
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
For chemistry what are the conversions we need to know and how do we do them? Like converting things to ppm or ppb
 

CecilyMare

Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2009
Messages
717
Location
Transylvania
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
Ppm is mg/L and ppb is 1/1000 ppm

Did someone say final prep

Describe mercury cell, diaphragm cell and the membrane cell
 

elvishtears

Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2010
Messages
37
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Is it illegal for my teacher to not have done any pracs for the forensics option topic? she didn't even give us any sheets on any of the pracs
 

jamesfirst

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,005
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
The Meissner effect is completely separate to eddy current induction. If you place a magnet on a superconductor *while* it is being cooled, it will begin to rise into the air with NO initial change in magnetic flux (explained to me at USyd). The levitation occurs *only* due to the exclusion of magnetic fields.
this is why I asked...

wtf
 

jamesfirst

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,005
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
I assume its C
In 1, rinse with water then filled with acid dilutes it - it should be rinse with water, flling acid then acid added in
In 3, conical flask rinsed with base solution, adding the base solution from pipette will increase concentration of the base - it should be conical flask rinse water then add base
Looking at that, the acid is diluted so more acid will be used but since the concntration of base is incrase, even more acid will be used so C
I thought rinsing it with base doesn't affect the concentration ????
 

jniranjan

Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
109
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
For astrophysics, do you have to know the equation for the PP chain and the CNO cycle?
 

jamesfirst

Active Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2010
Messages
2,005
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
You asked whether you should explain levitation in terms of eddy current induction or the Meissner effect (implying both are valid explanations). Eddy current induction is completely wrong.
But past hsc papers had that has the sample answer. Even the CSSA ones
 
K

khorne

Guest
For astrophysics, do you have to know the equation for the PP chain and the CNO cycle?
THe overall equation, yes. But not the individual. Suffice to say you just need to outline it.

For the Meissner Effect, this is true. Due to electron spin and such, magnetic dipoles are induced when it's at Tc and a magnet is lying on it, which would repel the magnet, and actively exclude the field. However, in all other cases, lenz's law is applicable. Its only when no change in flux and the magnet is close does the dipole exclusion apply.
 

weirdguy99

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2009
Messages
171
Location
Sydney, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
But past hsc papers had that has the sample answer. Even the CSSA ones
Yeah, I know. The reason given to me by the USyd professor was that the exclusion explanation is mostly out of the scope of the HSC course, and that currents are induced, but not due to Lenz's Law.
 

NubMuncher

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2011
Messages
129
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Yeah, I know. The reason given to me by the USyd professor was that the exclusion explanation is mostly out of the scope of the HSC course, and that currents are induced, but not due to Lenz's Law.
Umm I went to USyd as well and it was explained using faradays law and lenz's law.... Also, you said that if you put a magnet on the superconductor and then cooled it, it would begin to float. This is absolutely wrong, we were shown the exact opposite, with a magnet on top of a superconductor cooled and the magnet did not budge.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top