Section I - Multiple Choice (2 Viewers)

Rafy

Retired
Joined
Sep 30, 2004
Messages
10,719
Gender
Female
HSC
2005
Uni Grad
2008
Share your MC Answers here
 

KGZ9

Member
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
77
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
was shaun priniciple in the first degree of second?
 

xAlan

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
60
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
really? they weren't really hard, i finished in like 5-10 mintues.
 

Exotic

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
97
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
was shaun priniciple in the first degree of second?
Is that the 12 year old girl? shes was accessory after the fact.
I made sailly mistake, put judge instead of jury for the criminal trial decision question. Really stupid lol. Ill probably get around 16 im guessing.
 

andrew2527

New Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2011
Messages
29
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
No she was accessory before the fact. It said she was "waiting" at THEIR house. Therefore she already knew of the crime, well that's the way I took it anyway.
 

Exotic

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
97
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
No she was accessory before the fact. It said she was "waiting" at THEIR house. Therefore she already knew of the crime, well that's the way I took it anyway.
Interesting opinion mate, i never really thought of that. Anyone else to clarify which ones correct?
 

xAlan

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
60
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
No she was accessory before the fact. It said she was "waiting" at THEIR house. Therefore she already knew of the crime, well that's the way I took it anyway.
is it? wouldn't accessory before the fact be like she drove them to the bank? i put accessory after the fact because she was helping them AFTER the crime was committed. But idk :(
 

Phoenix 12

Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2011
Messages
48
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Uni Grad
2014
Is that the 12 year old girl? shes was accessory after the fact.
I made sailly mistake, put judge instead of jury for the criminal trial decision question. Really stupid lol. Ill probably get around 16 im guessing.
Um wasn't judge correct?
 

sakatahahaha

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2011
Messages
73
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Um wasn't judge correct?
Judge is correct .. The role of the judge is to conduct trial by the rule of the law direct the jury in their role.. Permit relevant evidence bla bla jury has no role in answering questions of the law they sit shut up and give a verdict
 

hamburger_eddy

New Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
13
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2011
for the question about which of the options may be an aggrevating factor, what did you guys put?

i put the age of the offender because i know young offender = mitigating factor, therefore older offender = aggrevating? starting to doubt myself thinking it was age of victim :(
 

Exotic

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2011
Messages
97
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
for the question about which of the options may be an aggrevating factor, what did you guys put?

i put the age of the offender because i know young offender = mitigating factor, therefore older offender = aggrevating? starting to doubt myself thinking it was age of victim :(
I put age of the victim because if the victim is young or a minor or whatever its an aggravating factor. Raping a 20 yo and a 9 yo is not the same.
 

xAlan

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
60
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
I put age of the victim because if the victim is young or a minor or whatever its an aggravating factor. Raping a 20 yo and a 9 yo is not the same.
Is it? I thought aggrevating factor means it makes the matter more worse for the offender. So i put "offender not being aware of the consequences of their actions" thought this meant he didnt care about what he was doing and that makes it worse.
 

Simone23

New Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2011
Messages
12
Gender
Female
HSC
2011
The girl was an accessory AFTER the fact as she assisted after! just because she was 'waiting' doesnt mean shes an accessory before.
 

hamburger_eddy

New Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2011
Messages
13
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2011
I put age of the victim because if the victim is young or a minor or whatever its an aggravating factor. Raping a 20 yo and a 9 yo is not the same.
hmmm makes sense but can you see what i'm saying..
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top