HSC 2012 MX2 Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

kingkong123

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2011
Messages
98
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon



i did it but i want to know if there's a neater/easier solution.
go wild
 

deswa1

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
2,256
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon



i did it but i want to know if there's a neater/easier solution.
go wild

From memory, the only way to do this involves a lot of trig manipulation so I don't think there's a faster way. I'm happy to be corrected though
 

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

factorise Z5-1=0, Into real linear and quadratic roots.
Since it's z^5, there are 5 roots.
z^5-1=0
.`. z^5=1
Hence, z0=1+0i

This can be shown as cis0
In complex roots of unity, the other 5 roots will be shown equal angles around the unit circle.

Since 360/5=72
.`. z0=cis0
z1=cis72
z2=cis144
z3=cis216
z4=cis288

You can factorise this as (z-z0)(z-z1)(z-z2)(z-z3)(z-z4)=0

Now, this equals to (z-cis0)(z-cis144)...(z-cis288)=0

Is this right?
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

someth1ing, try to avoid using degrees. In Extension 2, we use radians now.
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,393
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon



i did it but i want to know if there's a neater/easier solution.
go wild
Just sub it in to verify. For point P



For point Q, one can argue that similarly (with theta and alpha interchanged) the LHS expression reduces to



but using the property that the cosine is an even function i.e.



we can see that it becomes the RHS as well
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

Perhaps I'm just very picky, but I've never really been a fan of 'proving' expressions using the LHS = XXXX = RHS method.

I prefer derivations. Maybe it's just me.
 

Trebla

Administrator
Administrator
Joined
Feb 16, 2005
Messages
8,393
Gender
Male
HSC
2006
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

The actual derivation of the equation would be more appropriate if you were asked to find the equation rather than prove it.
 
Last edited:

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

someth1ing, try to avoid using degrees. In Extension 2, we use radians now.
Yeah, you're right - I shouldn't be using degrees but it was abit of an inconvenience for me to use radiance since I would have to type "pi" or something and it would get abit messy. It's still technically right, right?
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

The actual derivation of the equation would be more appropriate if you were asked to find the equation rather than prove it.
Oh of course, substituting in and proving LHS = XXXX = RHS is perfectly valid and takes up very little time.

What I was trying to convey is that I feel uncomfortable accepting a formula, then using it without understanding where it came from (unless deriving it requires higher maths of course).

Yeah, you're right - I shouldn't be using degrees but it was abit of an inconvenience for me to use radiance since I would have to type "pi" or something and it would get abit messy. It's still technically right, right?
Yes it is still 'technically' right.

However, your answer is incorrect because the question asked for real linear and quadratic factors. You had linear complex factors. You need to pair up the solutions with the appropriate conjugate in order to acquire this.
 

IamBread

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2011
Messages
757
Location
UNSW
Gender
Male
HSC
2011
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

Perhaps I'm just very picky, but I've never really been a fan of 'proving' expressions using the LHS = XXXX = RHS method.

I prefer derivations. Maybe it's just me.
Yeah you're picky :p. I like that method, it is generally a lot easier ha :D
 

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

However, your answer is incorrect because the question asked for real linear and quadratic factors. You had linear complex factors. You need to pair up the solutions with the appropriate conjugate in order to acquire this.
What do you mean?
 

Carrotsticks

Retired
Joined
Jun 29, 2009
Messages
9,494
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
N/A
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon



This was your solution. However, they are linear complex factors, since if I expand out the cis, I will get an i, which makes the factor complex.

Expand the cis (leave in exact form) and simplify the expressions. If you do this correctly, you will notice a 'difference of two squares' situation.
 

D94

New Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
4,423
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

Errr...I don't know what you mean.
Group the conjugate pairs and then you'll notice that (e.g. z1 and z2 are conjugates) (z-z1)(z-z2) will equal z^2 -(z1 + z2)z + z1.z2

So, adding conjugates, you'll end up with the 'cos' part of the expression, and multiplying conjugates, you'll get 1. Hence now all parts are linear expressions, and not complex.
 

someth1ng

Retired Nov '14
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
5,558
Location
Adelaide, Australia
Gender
Male
HSC
2012
Uni Grad
2021
Re: 2012 HSC MX2 Marathon

Oh, I'm assuming that I need to actually know how to do that?

Okay, I understand how that works now.
 
Last edited:

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top