A Aron New Member Joined Aug 2, 2013 Messages 21 Gender Male HSC N/A Oct 10, 2013 #1 Find the equation of the parabola with vertex (-2,3) that also passes through (2,1) and is concave downwards. Thanks in advance
Find the equation of the parabola with vertex (-2,3) that also passes through (2,1) and is concave downwards. Thanks in advance
B braintic Well-Known Member Joined Jan 20, 2011 Messages 2,137 Gender Undisclosed HSC N/A Oct 10, 2013 #2 (x+2)^2 = 4a(y-3) Substitute (2,1): 16 = -8a a=-2 So equation is (x+2)^2 = -8(y-3)
Q QZP Well-Known Member Joined Oct 7, 2013 Messages 839 Gender Undisclosed HSC 2014 Oct 10, 2013 #3 How can focal LENGTH be negative?? :S
hamstar Member Joined Oct 10, 2013 Messages 81 Gender Male HSC 2013 Oct 10, 2013 #4 QZP said: How can focal LENGTH be negative?? :S Click to expand... well in the above solution, it is supposed to be (x+2)^2=-4a(y-3) (this is because it is concave down) and then u sub in the points (2,1) and you get 16=8a hence a=2 therefore the equation is (x+2)^2 = -8(y-3) Last edited: Oct 10, 2013
QZP said: How can focal LENGTH be negative?? :S Click to expand... well in the above solution, it is supposed to be (x+2)^2=-4a(y-3) (this is because it is concave down) and then u sub in the points (2,1) and you get 16=8a hence a=2 therefore the equation is (x+2)^2 = -8(y-3)
Q QZP Well-Known Member Joined Oct 7, 2013 Messages 839 Gender Undisclosed HSC 2014 Oct 10, 2013 #5 I know Just wanted people to notice the fallacy.
B braintic Well-Known Member Joined Jan 20, 2011 Messages 2,137 Gender Undisclosed HSC N/A Oct 11, 2013 #6 QZP said: I know Just wanted people to notice the fallacy. Click to expand... There is no requirement for 'a' to represent the focal length unless it is defined that way in the question.
QZP said: I know Just wanted people to notice the fallacy. Click to expand... There is no requirement for 'a' to represent the focal length unless it is defined that way in the question.
A Aron New Member Joined Aug 2, 2013 Messages 21 Gender Male HSC N/A Oct 11, 2013 #7 thanks, now i see to sub in the vertex co-ordinates in the equation of the parabola. Cheers for the reply
thanks, now i see to sub in the vertex co-ordinates in the equation of the parabola. Cheers for the reply