girlworld_club
Member
Re: HSC 2013 2U Marathon
thanks. haha silly me
thanks. haha silly me
yes i did that i get to
-12 sin (2x + pi/4) = 0
And a take the basic angle as 0 degrees? So i end up with 0, 180, 360, etc then minus pi/4 and divide by 2 for each.
feel like i'm doing something wrong can't seem to get answer.
Answer is D. Since concavity at a is upwards, so f''(a) > 0, and the gradient at a is negative, so f'(a) < 0.
Give a reasoning with your answer so I know you know how to do it
YepAnswer is D. Since concavity at a is upwards, so f''(a) > 0, and the gradient at a is negative, so f'(a) < 0.
I would like to know this too? Do you have to only work on one side or can you solve both sides at once?
My method:
2cos^2(x)+1=3-2sin^2(x)
2cos^2(x) = 2-2sin^2(x)
cos^2(x) = 1-sin^2(x)
cos^2(x) = cos^2(x)
Since 1-sin^2(x) = cos^2(x)
Is this a viable method to solve this question or do I have to muck around with one side w/o touching the other?
You can do one of the following.I would like to know this too? Do you have to only work on one side or can you solve both sides at once?
How about adding a variable (say X) to the RHS then you can play around with both sides at the same time, as long as you prove that X=0.You can do one of the following.
LHS = ... = ... = ... = RHS
--------------
RHS = ... = ... = ... = LHS-
--------------
LHS = ... = X
RHS = ... = X
Therefore LHS = RHS.
That is valid, but I've never really seen a problem that needed that.How about adding a variable (say X) to the RHS then you can play around with both sides at the same time, as long as you prove that X=0.
For purposes of the HSC yes.So my method's incorrect?
Is this an arithmetic series and we just apply the formula don't we?
Not quite, the angles are in AP but the actual terms may not necessarily be in AP.Is this an arithmetic series and we just apply the formula don't we?