probably a troll but may as well bite
Why does only Asian languages have heritage and background courses?
A children born in China and study there until say year 6, comes to Australia and if he wants to do Chinese in HSC, he must do the harder 2U background course. If a child born in Germany and study there for the same amount of time, can do German continuer and extension for a total of 3 units at a much easier level.
Why is that? Does not sound fair to me.
probably because bostes noticed trends like this
"The vast majority of people who reported an Australian ancestry were born in Australia (98%). For most other ancestries, the majority of people were born either in Australia or the country associated with their ancestry. The European ancestries in the top 10 ancestry groups follow this pattern. For example, 83% of people who reported German ancestry were born in Australia and 10% were born in Germany. Only 7% were born in other countries. This pattern differed for the Asian countries in the top 10 ancestry groups. For example, for those who reported Chinese ancestry, 36% were born in China, 26% in Australia and 38% born in other countries. Of those who reported Indian ancestry, 61% were born in India, 20% in Australia and 19% born in other countries."
http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/2071.0main+features902012-2013
would be a waste of time, effort and money applying it to euro groups when the demand/need for it is considerably less
Try not to be so hysterical and trigger happy with the racist card, you're only cheapening it and making future (real) cases of racism prone to being overlooked by associating it with irrationalism
If this girl can't get a high atar without doing 'harder' subjects then she's really quite unimpressive