HSC 2016 MX2 Integration Marathon (archive) (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Drsoccerball

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
3,650
Gender
Undisclosed
HSC
2015
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

But I thought he did that already and then used the fundamental theorem of calculus to revert the derivative?



Or was the wrong part of the working what was being integrated. I'm not fully processing maths today to figure it out myself
His second last part is wrong then.
 

InteGrand

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2014
Messages
6,109
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

How does -1 become -x when the fundamental theorem of calculus is used?
Wasn't the –1 just a typo? (By the way, this wasn't the fundamental theorem of calculus. The symbol ∫ on its own (without any limits of integration) just means an antiderivative, so ∫d/dx (f(x)) dx = f(x) (+C) simply because ∫ and d/dx are essentially inverse operators.)
 
Last edited:

omegadot

Active Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2015
Messages
230
Gender
Male
HSC
N/A
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

How does -1 become -x when the fundamental theorem of calculus is used?
Wasn't the –1 just a typo? (By the way, this wasn't the fundamental theorem of calculus. The symbol ∫ on its own (without any limits of integration) just means an antiderivative, so ∫d/dx (f(x)) dx = f(x) (+C) simply because ∫ and d/dx are essentially inverse operators.)
 

KingOfActing

lukewarm mess
Joined
Oct 31, 2015
Messages
1,016
Location
Sydney
Gender
Male
HSC
2016
Re: MX2 2016 Integration Marathon

It requires 3 substitutions.
Are you sure it has a nice closed form? My first substitution was which made the integral to to by integration by parts, and I'm pretty sure that second integral doesn't have a closed form solution.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 2)

Top